Abstract
LIN28, an RNA-binding protein, is known to be involved in the regulation of many cellular processes, such as embryonic stem cell proliferation, cell fate succession, developmental timing, and oncogenesis. However, its expression and function in central nervous system still unclear. In this study, we performed an acute spinal cord contusion injury (SCI) model in adult rats and investigated the dynamic changes of LIN28 expression in spinal cord. Western blot and immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that LIN28 was present in normal spinal cord. It gradually increased, reached a peak at 3 day, and then nearly declined to the basal level at 14 days after SCI. Double immunofluorescence staining showed that LIN28 immunoreactivity was found in neurons, astrocytes and a handful of microglia. Interestingly, LIN28 expression was increased predominantly in astrocytes but not in neurons. Moreover, the colocalization of LIN28 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen was detected after injury. Western blot showed that LIN28 participated in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced astrocytes inflammatory responses by NF-κB signaling pathway. These results suggested that LIN28 may be involved in the pathologic process of SCI, and further research is needed to have a good understanding of its function and mechanism.
Keywords: LIN28, Spinal cord injury, Inflammatory, Astrocytes
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating and common neurologic disorder that has profound influences on modern society from physical, psychosocial, and socioeconomic perspectives [1–3]. It is generally accepted that acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is a two step process involving primary and secondary injury mechanisms [4, 5]. Secondary injury of SCI may result from spinal cord edema, ischemia, free radical damage, electrolyte imbalance, excitotoxicity, inflammatory injury, and apoptosis [6–9]. These factors cause astrocytes proliferation and reactive gliosis, resulting in the formation of a dense astrocytic scar [10, 11]. This glial scar provides a physical and biochemical barrier to regeneration and plasticity, and acts as a source of multiple inhibitory factors that affect functional recovery from SCI [12, 13]. All these alterations contribute to the long term neurological damage which results in neuronal loss and causes a variety of neurological, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive deficits [9]. An increasing number of researches have implicated neurological damage and dysfunction after SCI [5, 14]. However, it is remain to be further elucidated about the molecular mechanisms of post traumatic pathology of spinal cord.
The heterochronic gene, LIN28, is an evolutionarily conserved RNA-binding protein that was first identified in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, in which it displays tissue- and stage-specific patterns of expression. LIN28 mutations results in either the advanced or delayed maturational events [15, 16]. The mammalian genome encodes two homologs of the C. elegans LIN28 genes, LIN28A and LIN28B [17, 18]. In mammals, LIN28, also termed LIN28A, is ubiquitously expressed in early embryonic stages. As development proceeds, its Multi-expressed in several tissues such as cardiac and skeletal muscles [19, 20]. With research on Lin28 growing number of studies have found it also expressed in the central nervous system [21]. This is consistent with the results we saw in the expression of Lin28 in GeneCards. LIN28 is known to be involved in many important processes such as germ cell development [22], embryogenesis [23], skeletal myogenesis [24],glucose metabolism [25], cell fate succession [26, 27], and cellular differentiation [28, 29].
Extensively expressed in embryonic stem (ES) and embryonic carcinoma (EC) cells, LIN28 promotes pluripotency and proliferation in these cells by regulating let-7 family microRNAs (miRNAs) or acting independently of miRNAs [30–33]. Besides its role on pluripotency, LIN28 is known to regulate the translation of a set of genes crucial for the growth and survival of human ES cells [33]. In agreement with this, [9] reported the pro-growth function of LIN28 in mouse primary hippocampal neurons. Moreover, it has been reported that LIN28 may be associated with the enhanced viability of cancer and ES cells [34, 35]. Based on these above results, it seems that LIN28 may play a formerly unknown role in the regulation of cellular processes. However, the physiological role of LIN28 in central nervous system (CNS) remains to be investigated.
In this study, we examined the temporospatial expression of LIN28 protein and its colocalization with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in an acute SCI model of adult rats. We also found LIN28 participated in astrocytes inflammatory responses through NF-κB signaling pathway. These data were conducted to gain greater insight into the functions of LIN28 and its roles in the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying central nerve injury and repair.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Adult male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 200–250 g (Experimental Animal Center, Nantong University, China) were used in this study. All protocols with animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996) and guidelines for the International Association for the Study of Pain [36] and were conducted according to the Animals Care and Use Committee of Nantong University and approved by the Jiangsu Province Animal Care Ethics Committee.
Behavior Analysis
The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) open field score was used to assess locomotion in terms of hind limb functional improvement of rats with spinal cord contusion. The BBB test was scored from 0 (no observable hind limb movement) to 21 points (normal coordinate gait), using paw placement, joint movement, and truncal stability as important factors in determining the level of functional recovery. Scores in the 0–7 range focus primarily on hip, knee, and ankle joint movement, the 8–13 range keys in on paw placement and coordination, and scores of 14–21 rely heavily on trunk stability, tail position, and paw placement. In this study, the behavior analysis was performed at 0, 6, 12 h, 1, 3, 5, 7 and 14 days after injury. The results are presented as mean ± S.E. The two tailed Mann–Whitney test and repeated measures analysis of variance were performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the results using SPSS 11.0 software. The p value obtained from these method was <0.05.
Surgical Procedures
Dorsal laminectomies at the level of the ninth thoracic vertebra (T9) were carried out under anesthesia with ketamine (90 mg/kg)/xyla-zine (10 mg/kg), and surgery was performed in aseptic conditions. Ketoprofen (5 mg/kg) was administered to minimize postsurgical pain and discomfort. Contusion injury groups (n = 51) were performed using the NYU impactor [37]; the exposed spinal cord was contused by dropping a rod 2.0 mm in diameter and 10 g in weight from a height of 75 mm for 33 rats [38–40]. The rest of the contusion injuries (n = 21) were divided randomly into seven groups of three animals. The seven groups were contused from different heights (6.25, 1 2.5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 mm, respectively). Sham operated animals (n = 12) were anesthetized and surgically prepared but did not receive spinal injury. After SCI, the overlying muscles and skin were closed in layers with 4–0 silk sutures and staples. The animals were allowed to recover on a 30 °C heating pad. Postoperative treatments included saline (2.0 ml, s.c.) for rehydration and Baytril (0.3 ml, 22.7 mg/ml, s.c. once daily) to prevent urinary tract infection. Bladders were manually expressed twice daily until reflex bladder emptying returned. Animals were housed under a 12 h light/dark cycle in a pathogen-free area with free access to water and food. The spontaneous recovery of locomotor function after SCI was examined using the Basso, Beattie and B resnahan (BBB) rating scale [41]. Animals were killed at 6, 12 h, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after injury. Fifteen sham animals were used as sham controls. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
Primary Astrocyte Cultures and Cell Treatment
Astrocyte cultures were prepared from spinal cords of adult male Sprague–Dawley rats using a previously described method [42, 43] with a few modifications. The spinal cords were ejected from the vertebral column using a saline-filled syringe. The tissue was chemically dissociated with 0.25 % trypsin–EDTA for 10 min followed by mechanical trituration in modified essential medium (DMEM). After centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 5 min, the cells were suspended with DMEM/F12 culture medium, containing 10 % heat-inactivated FBS and 1 % glutamine, and plated in a flask. The cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 95 % O2/5 % CO2 at 37 °C for 48–72 h to allow the cells sufficient time to adhere and begin multiplying. The medium was changed at every 24 h. Approximately on days 10 and 11, flasks were wrapped in plastic, placed on a shaker platform in a horizontal position with the medium covering the cells, and were shaken at 350 rpm for 6 h at 37 °C to separate the microglia from the astrocytes. The next day, the cells were trypsinized and replanted in six-well plates (40,000 cells per well). Prior to experimental treatments, cultures of astrocytes were passaged twice. Cell culture medium was switched to serum-free DMEM/F12 culture medium.
The astrocytes were synchronized for 24 h in the absence of serum and then incubated in the absence of serum and in the presence or absence of 1 μg/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Three different treatment regimens were assigned: (1) untreated controls, (2) cells treated with LPS (1 μg/ml), (3) cells pretreated with PDTC (100 μM) for 2 h and treated with LPS (1 μg/ml). Then these cells were harvested for western blot analysis.
Western Blot
In order to obtain samples for western blot analysis, the sham or injured spinal cords were excised. The portion of the spinal cord extending 5 mm rostral and 5 mm caudal to the injury epicenter was dissected out and immediately frozen at −80 °C until use. To prepare lysates, frozen spinal cord samples were minced with eye scissors on ice. The samples were then homogenized in lysis buffer (1 % NP-40, 50 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.5, 5 mmol/L EDTA, 1 % SDS, 1 % sodium deoxycholate, 1 % Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L PMSF, 10 mg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mg/ml leupeptin) and clarified by centrifuging for 20 min in a microcentrifuge at 4 °C. After determination of its protein concentration with the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad), the resulting supernatant (50 μg of protein) was subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10 % of acrylamide). The separated proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore) by a transfer apparatus at 300 mA for 2 h. The membrane was then blocked with 5 % nonfat milk and incubated with primary antibodies against LIN28 (anti-rabbit, 1:600; Abcam), GAPDH (anti-rabbit, 1:1000; Sigma), NF-κB p50 (anti-rabbit, 1:500; Sigma), NF-κB p65 (anti-rabbit, 1:1000; Sigma), p-p65 (anti-rabbit, 1:800; Abcam), or p-IκBα(anti-rabbit, 1:500; Abcam) at 4 °C overnight. After incubating with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, protein was visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce Company, USA).
Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescent, and H&E Staining
The sham and injured rats were terminally anesthetized and perfused through the ascending aorta with saline, followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde at different survival time points. After the perfusion, the spinal cords of the sham and injured rats were removed and post-fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 3 h. The spinal cords were then subsequently placed in 20 % sucrose for 2–3 days and followed by 30 % sucrose for an additional 2–3 days. Next, the spinal cords were embedded in O.T.C. compound for cryosectioning. The tissue was transversely cut into 9-μm-thick sections at two spinal cord levels (3 mm rostral and caudal to the epicenter of the injury) and examined. All of the sections were blocked with 10 % donkey serum with 0.3 % Triton X-100 and 1 % (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 2 h at room temperature (RT) and was incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-LIN28 (anti-rabbit, 1:100; Abcam), followed by incubation in a biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlin-game, CA). The immunostaining was visualized with DAB (Vector Laboratories). Cells with strong or moderate brown staining were counted as positive, cells with no staining were counted as negative, and the cells with weak staining were scored separately.
For hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, spinal cord samples were fixed in 10 % formalin solution, embedded in paraffin,and sliced into cross-sections of 7-μm thickness at two spinal cord levels (2 mm rostral and caudal to the epicenter of injury). Then, these sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
For double immunofluorescent staining, slide-mounted sections were removed from the freezer and incubated in an oven at 37 °C for 40 min. Next, the sections were incubated in a blocking solution, containing 10 % normal serum from the same species as the secondary antibody, 3 % BSA, 0.1 % Triton X-100 and 0.05 % Tween-20 for 2 h at RT to prevent nonspecific staining. Next, the sections were incubated with anti-LIN28 (anti-rabbit, 1:100; Abcam). The cell-specific markers NeuN (neuronal marker, 1:100; Millipore, MAB377), GFAP (astrocytic marker, 1:100; Sigma), S100B(astrocytes marker, 1:100; Sigma), Iba1(microglia marker, 1:50; Serotec) or proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, anti-mouse, 1:50; Santa Cruz) were applied simultaneously. The sections were incubated with the primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by a mixture of CY2- and CY3-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C. The stained sections were then examined using a Leica fluorescence microscope (Germany).
Quantitative Analysis
The number of LIN28-positive cells in the spinal cord 2 mm rostral to the epicenter was counted in a 500 × 500 μm measuring frame. For each animal, a measure was taken in a section through the dorsal horn, the lateral funiculus, and the ventral horn. We counted every fifth section (50 μm apart) to avoid counting the same cell in more than one section. The cell counts were then used to determine the total number of LIN28-positive cells per square millimeter. We simultaneously quantified the percentage of cells with cytoplasmic LIN28 staining. Cells double-labeled for LIN28 and the cell-specific makers NeuN, GFAP, S100B, Iba1 and PCNA were quantified, too. In order to identify the proportion of each phenotype-specific marker-positive cells expressing LIN28, a minimum of 200 phenotype specific marker-positive cells were counted in both the white matter and gray matter in each section. We then recorded the number of cells double-labeled with LIN28 and a cell-specific marker. Two or three adjacent sections per animal were sampled at 2 mm from the epicenter.
Statistical Analysis
All of the data were analyzed with the Stata 7.0 statistical software. All of the values were expressed as the mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hocmultiple comparison tests was used for the statistical analysis. p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Each experiment consisted of at least three replicates per condition.
Results
Behavioral Changes, Histopathological and Morphological Examination Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
The spontaneous recovery of locomotor function after spinal cord injury was tested by using the BBB rating scale [41]. Scores were recorded and the averages are shown in (Fig. 1). All animals slacked hindlimb locomotion after contusion to their spinal cords. Some spontaneous improvement in function occurred with time after SCI.
Then to analyze histology and morphology after spinal cord injury, we performed H&E staining for spinal cord with paraffin histopathology sections. Vacuoles, Edema, irregularly shaped spaces, axon degradation, and disorders of the organization in the white matter were noted in the areas extending 2 mm from the center of the SCI lesions (Fig. 1d), while no lesions were observed in the sham controls (Fig. 1a, c). The majority of typical characteristics of neuronal apoptosis including nuclear fragmentation, nuclear disappear,and nuclear pyknosis were seen in the gray matter (Fig. 1b).
The Temporal Expression of LIN28 Following Spinal Cord Injury
We examined the temporal expression patterns of LIN28 following spinal cord contusion injury by western blot. It was proved that LIN28 expression was low in sham operated spinal cords but increased at 12 h after SCI and reached a peak at day 3 (*p < 0.05); then, it gradually decreased to control levels (Fig. 2a, b). This result demonstrated that LIN28 might be involved in the process of SCI in a time dependent manner.
Dose–Response Effects’ Between the SCI and LIN28 Expression
To further testify that LIN28 expression is related to the SCI, we investigated the effects of contusion induced by dropping the rod from different heights (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25,50, 75, 100, and 125 mm) at day 3 after SCI and observed the expression patterns of LIN28 by western blot. Following the contusion height being increased, LIN28 expression enhanced gradually, got a peak at 75 mm height, and then declined weakly in the case of 100 and 125 mm injury. However, contusion induced by 6.25 and 12.5 mm height could not raise the up-regulation of LIN28 expression, compared with its expression in the sham groups (Fig. 3a, b). These data demonstrated that the up-regulation of LIN28 is indeed related to spinal cord injury.
Changes in Expression and Distribution of LIN28 in the Spinal Cord
To identify the cellular localization and the temporal changes of LIN28 immunoreactivity in spinal cord, we carried out immunohistochemisry experiments with anti-LIN28 rabbit polyclonal antibody on transverse cryosections of the spinal cord, 2 mm rostral to the epicenter. As shown above, LIN28 protein has the maximal protein expression at day 3. Thus, we chose 3 days after SCI as the time point for our microscopic work. According to the positive cell profiles, LIN28 was widely expressed in both the ventral horn and white matter (Fig. 4a, b) including neurons and glial cells, regardless of whether sham or injury. Interesting, at high magnification, injury increased LIN28 significantly in white matter (Fig. 4e, f), but the positively stained intensity in gray matter did not change obviously (Fig. 4c, d). No staining was observed in the negative control sections (Fig. 4g). At the same time, we found their quantitative changes to be parallel with the western blot results (Fig. 4h).
The Colocalization of LIN28 with Different Phenotype Specific Markers in the Adult Rat Spinal Cord After SCI
To further address the expression of LIN28 in the spinal cord, we performed double immunofluorescent microscopy studies in transverse cryosections of spinal cord tissues within 2 mm distance from the lesion site by colabeling with NeuN, GFAP, S100B or Iba1. We found LIN28 expression in neurons, astrocytes and few microglia (Fig. 5). Significantly, such expression was increased more significantly in astrocytes at 3 day after SCI compared with the sham spinal cord (Fig. 5g–l). To further confirm this result, we have chosen S100B which a functional astroglial marker, also found that the above phenomena (Fig. 5m–r). LIN28 is expressed in microglia also change but the expression is far less than astrocytes, so we focused on studies of it relationship with the astrocytes (Fig. 5s–x). No staining was observed in the negative control sections (Fig. 5y). As shown in (Fig. 5z), the numbers of astrocytes and LIN28-positive astrocytes increased prominently after injury compared with sham-operated spinal cord (*p < 0.05), while such change was not detected in neurons.
Colocolization of LIN28 and the Cellular Proliferation Marker in the Adult Rat Spinal Cord after SCI
The following studies were performed to demonstrate the relationship between LIN28 expression and cell proliferation in the spinal cord after SCI. We first examined the expression of PCNA, which has been used as a general marker of dividing cells, in the injured spinal cord [44, 45]. PCNA expression increased gradually and reached a peak at 3–5 days and deceased thereafter (Fig. 6a). We next performed double-labeling immunofluorescent staining of PCNA together with GFAP or with LIN28 in SCI and sham spinal cords (Fig. 6b). As shown in (Fig. 6Bf), the majority of activated astrocytes were PCNA-positive. Furthermore, there was also colocalization between LIN28 and PCNA (Fig. 6Bi,l). However, almost no detectable expression of PCNA could be observed in the sham groups by immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 6Bb,h).
The Expression and Correlation of LIN28 and NF-κB Signaling Pathway During LPS Induced Astrocytes Activation
It is well known that NF-κB signaling pathway plays an important role in the regulation of astrocytes inflammation. Sequence analysis revealed a highly conserved NF-κB motif in the first intron of the lin-28B gene [46]. In order to explore the expression pattern and possible mechanisms of LIN28 during astrocyte activation, we employed LPS (1 μg/ml), a widely used immunological stimulus, to mimic astrocyte activation in vitro [47]. As expected, the expression of iNOS, a marker of astrocyte activation, was gradually up-regulated 4 h post LPS treatment, reached a peak at 6 h, and then slightly declined.
Western blot detected a significant increased phosphorylation and a rapid protein degradation of IκBα in the astrocytes at 6 and 8 h post LPS treatment. Meanwhile, LIN28 protein expression was up-regulated by LPS stimulation, and the maximum response was observed at 6 h following LPS exposure (*p < 0.05) (Fig. 7a, b). Phosphorylation of p65 potentiates NF-κB transactivation [20]. Western blot analysis revealed an elevated phosphorylation level of p65 protein (p-p65) 6 h following LPS stimulation (Fig. 7a, b) (*p < 0.05). After pretreatment with PDTC, an NF-κB inhibitor, the LPS-induced p-p65 expression was significantly inhibited in astrocytes. Interestingly, blocking of NF-κB activation by PDTC greatly aborted LPS-induced expression of LIN28 (Fig. 7c, d). Taken together, our results demonstrated that LPS can stimulate LIN28 expression in astrocytes via the NF-κB signaling pathway.
Discussion
The pathological process of SCI involves both primary and secondary injury mechanisms [48, 49]. It leads to a series of molecular and cellular events, which evolves over the following hours and days, resulting in reactive gliosis, neuronal apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress [5, 50, 51]. These factors cause hypertrophy, proliferation, and migration of astrocytes [52, 53]. Astrocytes contribute to the formation of a glial scar at the lesion border, which functions as a physical and chemical barrier to axonal regeneration [54–58]. Astrocyte activation is required for effective immune responses in the central neuronal system [59, 60]. Deregulation of inflammatory responses by astrocytes has been suggested to participate in the development of several neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, HIV-associated dementia, and multiple sclerosis [61–63]. Despite great efforts which have been devoted to this field, the exact molecular mechanisms of SCI, especially the contributions of asctrocytes to SCI progression, have not been clearly understood. In this study, we employed a spinal cord injury model in adult rats and explored the potential molecular mechanisms after SCI.
LIN28 is a conserved regulator of cell fate succession in animals [64]. Previous reports demonstrated that LIN-28 is one of several factors that participate in reprogramming mammalian somatic cells to pluripotent cells and that regulate processes of the germline, postnatal development, and cancer occurances [22, 65, 66]. Here, we revealed the expression profiles of LIN28 in adult rat’s spinal cord after injury. Western blot analysis showed that the expression of LIN28 was significantly increased and peaked at 3 days after injury. Laser scanning microscopic observation detected LIN28 mainly expression in neuron and astrocyte. After SCI, LIN28 expression was greatly increased in activated astrocyte, but exerted no detectable change in neurons. Additionally, we also found that LIN28 was colocalized with PCNA, a general marker of dividing cells. Thus, SCI might enhance the expression of LIN28 in the activated astrocytes. These findings might provide important information to discuss the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the neuronal inflammation after SCI.
To further study the expression and possible function of LIN28 in astrocyte-mediated neuronal inflammation, we imitated astrocyte activation with LPS treatment in vitro. Amount of evidence supported the indispensible contribution of NF-κB signaling pathway to LPS-mediated astrocyte activation. Furthermore, some studies proved that such a process might involve LIN28 [46]. To test whether the relationship mentioned above exists in astrocytes, we determined the patterns of NF-κB and LIN28 expression in cultured primary astrocytes following LPS exposure. Using Western blot analysis, we examined the related molecular variation trend about NF-κB signaling pathway, including P65, P50, IκBα, p-IκBα, p-P65, and confirmed the activation of NF-κB signaling pathway in astrocytes following LPS stimulation. At the same time, LIN28 protein expressed in a time-dependent manner. Moreover, blocking NF-κB activation with PDTC, a NF-κB inhibitor, significantly inhibited expression of LIN28. Thus, the above data suggested that LIN28 was regulated by NF-κB signaling pathway in LPS-induced astrocytes activation. Taken together, this may enable us to have a further investigation on the cell level to elucidate these mechanisms.
Overall SCI induces recruitment of hematogenous cells to the injured site. These cells produce inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, (IL)-1β, and TNF-α. And a lot of the literature demonstrated that astrocytes can be activated by LPS of appropriate dose/duration. These astrocytes reduces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF- α by interfering with TLR4/NF-κB signaling. These allow us to better combine vitro and in vivo experiments to discuss whether Influencing the LIN28 activation would be beneficial for astrocyte-mediated inflammation. In our view, since LIN28 through NF-κB signaling pathways involved in astrocyte inflammation of the SCI, then the expression of LIN28 by properly intervention would be helpful for CNS inflammation.
In summary, we investigated the protein expression and cellular localization of LIN28 during SCI. Our results provided a novel molecular pathway to detect the endogenous responses of CNS after SCI and a novel strategy for the treatment of spinal cord injury. Moreover, we found that LIN28 might involve in the activation of astrocytes following acute SCI. The results suggest that LIN28 is a useful role in controlling neuroinflammation. A further study should be performed to confirm the intrinsic mechanisms and functions of LIN28 in central nervous system injury and repair.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81271367). National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2012CB822104); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81202368, and 31072188); Key Project Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu University and College (No. 11KJA310002); Nantong City Social Development Projects funds (HS2012032); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Abbreviations
- SCI
Spinal cord contusion injury
- PCNA
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- LPS
Lipopolysaccharide
- CNS
Central nervous system
Footnotes
Ying Yue and Dongmei Zhang have contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Tao Tao, Email: nttaotao@ntu.edu.cn.
Xingxing Gu, Email: yueying1500628@163.com, Email: guxingxing@ntu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Saadoun S, Bell BA, Verkman AS, Papadopoulos MC. Greatly improved neurological outcome after spinal cord compression injury in AQP4-deficient mice. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 4):1087–1098. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ceruti S, Villa G, Genovese T, Mazzon E, Longhi R, Rosa P, Bramanti P, Cuzzocrea S, Abbracchio MP. The P2Y-like receptor GPR17 as a sensor of damage and a new potential target in spinal cord injury. Brain. 2009;132(Pt 8):2206–2218. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khalatbary AR, Zarrinjoei GR. Anti-inflammatory effect of oleuropein in experimental rat spinal cord trauma. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2012;14(4):229–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dumont RJ, Okonkwo DO, Verma S, Hurlbert RJ, Boulos PT, Ellegala DB, Dumont AS. Acute spinal cord injury, part I: pathophysiologic mechanisms. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2001;24(5):254–264. doi: 10.1097/00002826-200109000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu Y, Figley S, Spratt SK, Lee G, Ando D, Surosky R, Fehlings MG. An engineered transcription factor which activates VEGF-A enhances recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;37(2):384–393. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.10.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Torres BB, Caldeira FM, Gomes MG, Serakides R, de Marco Viott A, Bertagnolli AC, Fukushima FB, de Oliveira KM, Gomes MV, de Melo EG. Effects of dantrolene on apoptosis and immunohistochemical expression of NeuN in the spinal cord after traumatic injury in rats. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010;91(6):530–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2010.00738.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen KB, Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Hirai T, Watanabe S, Guerrero AR, Kobayashi S, Ma WY, Liu SY, Baba H. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist reduces apoptosis of neurons and oligodendroglia in rat spinal cord injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36(17):1350–1358. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f014ec. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Min KJ, Jeong HK, Kim B, Hwang DH, Shin HY, Nguyen AT, Kim JH, Jou I, Kim BG, Joe EH. Spatial and temporal correlation in progressive degeneration of neurons and astrocytes in contusion-induced spinal cord injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9:100. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Huan W, Wu X, Zhang S, Zhao Y, Xu H, Wang N, Li H, Chen H, Wei H, Wang Y. Spatiotemporal patterns and essential role of TNF receptor-associated factor 5 expression after rat spinal cord Injury. J Mol Histol. 2012;43(5):527–533. doi: 10.1007/s10735-012-9411-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Raghupathi R, Mehr MF, Helfaer MA, Margulies SS. Traumatic axonal injury is exacerbated following repetitive closed head injury in the neonatal pig. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(3):307–316. doi: 10.1089/089771504322972095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McGraw J, Hiebert GW, Steeves JD. Modulating astrogliosis after neurotrauma. J Neurosci Res. 2001;63(2):109–115. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20010115)63:2<109::AID-JNR1002>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Silver J, Miller JH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5(2):146–156. doi: 10.1038/nrn1326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davies SJ, Field PM, Raisman G. Regeneration of cut adult axons fails even in the presence of continuous aligned glial pathways. Exp Neurol. 1996;142(2):203–216. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1996.0192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jana A, Hogan EL, Pahan K. Ceramide and neurodegeneration: susceptibility of neurons and oligodendrocytes to cell damage and death. J Neurol Sci. 2009;278(1–2):5–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ambros V, Horvitz HR. Heterochronic mutants of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1984;226(4673):409–416. doi: 10.1126/science.6494891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moss EG, Lee RC, Ambros V. The cold shock domain protein LIN-28 controls developmental timing in C. elegans and is regulated by the lin-4 RNA. Cell. 1997;88(5):637–646. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81906-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Guo Y, Chen Y, Ito H, Watanabe A, Ge X, Kodama T, Aburatani H. Identification and characterization of lin-28 homolog B (LIN28B) in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene. 2006;384:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moss EG, Tang L. Conservation of the heterochronic regulator Lin-28, its developmental expression and microRNA complementary sites. Dev Biol. 2003;258(2):432–442. doi: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00126-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Richards M, Tan SP, Tan JH, Chan WK, Bongso A. The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Stem Cells. 2004;22(1):51–64. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.22-1-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang DH, Moss EG. Temporally regulated expression of Lin-28 in diverse tissues of the developing mouse. Gene Expr Patterns. 2003;3(6):719–726. doi: 10.1016/s1567-133x(03)00140-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bhuiyan MI, Lee JH, Kim SY, Cho KO. Expression of exogenous LIN28 contributes to proliferation and survival of mouse primary cortical neurons in vitro. Neuroscience. 2013;248C:448–458. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.West JA, Viswanathan SR, Yabuuchi A, Cunniff K, Takeuchi A, Park IH, Sero JE, Zhu H, Perez-Atayde A, Frazier AL, Surani MA, Daley GQ. A role for Lin28 in primordial germ-cell development and germ-cell malignancy. Nature. 2009;460(7257):909–913. doi: 10.1038/nature08210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yokoyama S, Hashimoto M, Shimizu H, Ueno-Kudoh H, Uchibe K, Kimura I, Asahara H. Dynamic gene expression of Lin-28 during embryonic development in mouse and chicken. Gene Expr Patterns. 2008;8(3):155–160. doi: 10.1016/j.gep.2007.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Polesskaya A, Cuvellier S, Naguibneva I, Duquet A, Moss EG, Harel-Bellan A. Lin-28 binds IGF-2 mRNA and participates in skeletal myogenesis by increasing translation efficiency. Genes Dev. 2007;21(9):1125–1138. doi: 10.1101/gad.415007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu H, Shyh-Chang N, Segre AV, Shinoda G, Shah SP, Einhorn WS, Takeuchi A, Engreitz JM, Hagan JP, Kharas MG, Urbach A, Thornton JE, Triboulet R, Gregory RI, Altshuler D, Daley GQ. The Lin28/let-7 axis regulates glucose metabolism. Cell. 2011;147(1):81–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.08.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rybak A, Fuchs H, Smirnova L, Brandt C, Pohl EE, Nitsch R, Wulczyn FG. A feedback loop comprising lin-28 and let-7 controls pre-let-7 maturation during neural stem-cell commitment. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(8):987–993. doi: 10.1038/ncb1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Balzer E, Heine C, Jiang Q, Lee VM, Moss EG. LIN28 alters cell fate succession and acts independently of the let-7 microRNA during neurogliogenesis in vitro. Development. 2010;137(6):891–900. doi: 10.1242/dev.042895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li X, Zhang J, Gao L, McClellan S, Finan MA, Butler TW, Owen LB, Piazza GA, Xi Y. MiR-181 mediates cell differentiation by interrupting the Lin28 and let-7 feedback circuit. Cell Death Differ. 2012;19(3):378–386. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2011.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kawahara H, Okada Y, Imai T, Iwanami A, Mischel PS, Okano H. Musashi1 cooperates in abnormal cell lineage protein 28 (Lin28)-mediated let-7 family microRNA biogenesis in early neural differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(18):16121–16130. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.199166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Viswanathan SR, Daley GQ. Lin28: a microRNA regulator with a macro role. Cell. 2010;140(4):445–449. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Darr H, Benvenisty N. Genetic analysis of the role of the reprogramming gene LIN-28 in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells. 2009;27(2):352–362. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2008-0720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Xu B, Zhang K, Huang Y. Lin28 modulates cell growth and associates with a subset of cell cycle regulator mRNAs in mouse embryonic stem cells. RNA. 2009;15(3):357–361. doi: 10.1261/rna.1368009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qiu C, Ma Y, Wang J, Peng S, Huang Y. Lin28-mediated post-transcriptional regulation of Oct4 expression in human embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(4):1240–1248. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li N, Zhong X, Lin X, Guo J, Zou L, Tanyi JL, Shao Z, Liang S, Wang LP, Hwang WT, Katsaros D, Montone K, Zhao X, Zhang L. Lin-28 homologue A (LIN28A) promotes cell cycle progression via regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2), cyclin D1 (CCND1), and cell division cycle 25 homolog A (CDC25A) expression in cancer. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(21):17386–17397. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.321158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peng S, Maihle NJ, Huang Y. Pluripotency factors Lin28 and Oct4 identify a sub-population of stem cell-like cells in ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29(14):2153–2159. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zimmermann M. Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain. 1983;16(2):109–110. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gruner JA (1992) A monitored contusion model of spinal cord injury in the rat. J Neurotrauma 9(2):123–126; discussion 126-128 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 38.Zhang S, Huan W, Wei H, Shi J, Fan J, Zhao J, Shen A, Teng H. FOXO3a/p27kip1 expression and essential role after acute spinal cord injury in adult rat. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(2):354–365. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shen A, Liu Y, Zhao J, Qin J, Shi S, Chen M, Gao S, Xiao F, Lu Q, Cheng C. Temporal-spatial expressions of p27kip1 and its phosphorylation on Serine-10 after acute spinal cord injury in adult rat: implications for post-traumatic glial proliferation. Neurochem Int. 2008;52(6):1266–1275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuint.2008.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wu G, Cao J, Peng C, Yang H, Cui Z, Zhao J, Wu Q, Han J, Li H, Gu X, Zhang F. Temporal and spatial expression of cyclin H in rat spinal cord injury. Neuromolecular Med. 2011;13(3):187–196. doi: 10.1007/s12017-011-8150-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(1):1–21. doi: 10.1089/neu.1995.12.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tawfik VL, Lacroix-Fralish ML, Bercury KK, Nutile-McMenemy N, Harris BT, Deleo JA. Induction of astrocyte differentiation by propentofylline increases glutamate transporter expression in vitro: heterogeneity of the quiescent phenotype. Glia. 2006;54(3):193–203. doi: 10.1002/glia.20365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Codeluppi S, Svensson CI, Hefferan MP, Valencia F, Silldorff MD, Oshiro M, Marsala M, Pasquale EB. The Rheb-mTOR pathway is upregulated in reactive astrocytes of the injured spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009;29(4):1093–1104. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4103-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu T, Wang X, Cao M, Wu X, Yan Y, Fu H, Zhao W, Gong P, Ke K, Gu X. Increased expression of BAG-1 in rat brain cortex after traumatic brain injury. J Mol Histol. 2012;43(3):335–342. doi: 10.1007/s10735-012-9408-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao W, Yang J, Shi W, Wu X, Shao B, Wu Q, Chen J, Ni L. Upregulation of p21-activated Kinase 6 in rat brain cortex after traumatic brain injury. J Mol Histol. 2011;42(3):195–203. doi: 10.1007/s10735-011-9324-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell. 2009;139(4):693–706. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Beurel E. HDAC6 regulates LPS-tolerance in astrocytes. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e25804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Park E, Velumian AA, Fehlings MG. The role of excitotoxicity in secondary mechanisms of spinal cord injury: a review with an emphasis on the implications for white matter degeneration. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(6):754–774. doi: 10.1089/0897715041269641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lu J, Ashwell KW, Waite P. Advances in secondary spinal cord injury: role of apoptosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(14):1859–1866. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200007150-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Choi DC, Lee JY, Moon YJ, Kim SW, Oh TH, Yune TY. Acupuncture-mediated inhibition of inflammation facilitates significant functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Neurobiol Dis. 2010;39(3):272–282. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lopez-Vales R, Redensek A, Skinner TA, Rathore KI, Ghasemlou N, Wojewodka G, DeSanctis J, Radzioch D, David S. Fenretinide promotes functional recovery and tissue protection after spinal cord contusion injury in mice. J Neurosci. 2010;30(9):3220–3226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5770-09.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Frisen J, Haegerstrand A, Risling M, Fried K, Johansson CB, Hammarberg H, Elde R, Hokfelt T, Cullheim S. Spinal axons in central nervous system scar tissue are closely related to laminin-immunoreactive astrocytes. Neuroscience. 1995;65(1):293–304. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)00467-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.White RE, McTigue DM, Jakeman LB. Regional heterogeneity in astrocyte responses following contusive spinal cord injury in mice. J Comp Neurol. 2010;518(8):1370–1390. doi: 10.1002/cne.22282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Liuzzi FJ, Lasek RJ. Astrocytes block axonal regeneration in mammals by activating the physiological stop pathway. Science. 1987;237(4815):642–645. doi: 10.1126/science.3603044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rudge JS, Silver J. Inhibition of neurite outgrowth on astroglial scars in vitro. J Neurosci. 1990;10(11):3594–3603. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-11-03594.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.White RE, Jakeman LB. Don’t fence me in harnessing the beneficial roles of astrocytes for spinal cord repair. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2008;26((2-3)):197–214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Billakanti R. Reactive astrogliosis after spinal cord injury-beneficial and detrimental effects. Mol Neurobiol. 2012;46(2):251–264. doi: 10.1007/s12035-012-8287-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.McKeon RJ, Schreiber RC, Rudge JS, Silver J. Reduction of neurite outgrowth in a model of glial scarring following CNS injury is correlated with the expression of inhibitory molecules on reactive astrocytes. J Neurosci. 1991;11(11):3398–3411. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-11-03398.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Saijo K, Winner B, Carson CT, Collier JG, Boyer L, Rosenfeld MG, Gage FH, Glass CK. A Nurr1/CoREST pathway in microglia and astrocytes protects dopaminergic neurons from inflammation-induced death. Cell. 2009;137(1):47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV. Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119(1):7–35. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0619-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Glass CK, Saijo K, Winner B, Marchetto MC, Gage FH. Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration. Cell. 2010;140(6):918–934. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Perry VH, Nicoll JA, Holmes C. Microglia in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6(4):193–201. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yadav A, Collman RG. CNS inflammation and macrophage/microglial biology associated with HIV-1 infection. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2009;4(4):430–447. doi: 10.1007/s11481-009-9174-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Vadla B, Kemper K, Alaimo J, Heine C, Moss EG. lin-28 controls the succession of cell fate choices via two distinct activities. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1151526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Viswanathan SR, Powers JT, Einhorn W, Hoshida Y, Ng TL, Toffanin S, O’Sullivan M, Lu J, Phillips LA, Lockhart VL, Shah SP, Tanwar PS, Mermel CH, Beroukhim R, Azam M, Teixeira J, Meyerson M, Hughes TP, Llovet JM, Radich J, Mullighan CG, Golub TR, Sorensen PH, Daley GQ. Lin28 promotes transformation and is associated with advanced human malignancies. Nat Genet. 2009;41(7):843–848. doi: 10.1038/ng.392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]