Table 7Review protocol: pharmacological management of respiratory secretions

ComponentDescription
Review question 6bFor people in the last days of life, which pharmacological agents are most effective in providing relief for troublesome respiratory secretions and what degree of sedation do they cause?
ObjectivesTo identify the most effective pharmacological treatment for respiratory secretions in the last days of life.
PopulationAdults in the last days of life

Exclusions:
  • Noisy breathing related to trauma or congenital abnormalities involving the respiratory tract were excluded
Intervention
  • Anticholinergics
  • Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist
  • Somatostatin analogue
Comparison(s(
  • Any of the above
  • Placebo
  • Usual care
OutcomesCRITICAL
  • Quality of life (either patient-rated, clinician-rated, carer-rated)
  • Sedation (either patient-rated, clinician-rated, carer-rated)
  • Subjective or objective improvement in respiratory secretions (patient-rated, clinician-rated, carer-rated).
IMPORTANT
  • Frequency of adverse events - for example Paradoxical agitation, Failure to expectorate, Dry mouth
  • Subjective ratings from informal carers' on distress relating to noisy breathing/respiratory secretions.
  • Subjective ratings from patients' on distress related to noisy breathing/respiratory secretions.
SubgroupsDrug class
Routes of administration
  • Enteral (includes oral and enteral tubes)
  • Intramuscular
  • Intravenous
  • Subcutaneous
  • Transdermal
  • Transmucosal (includes sublingual, buccal, nasal).
Delivery system
  • ‘Melt’ tablet
  • Bolus SC injection or continuous SC delivery by syringe driver
  • Continuous IV delivery by pump or Intermittent IV delivery by PCA
  • IM injection
  • Nasogastric tube
  • PEG tube
  • Skin patch
  • Sublingual, buccal, dissolving tablet
  • Tablet, liquid for enteral access.
Study design
  • Systematic reviews of RCTs
  • RCTs
  • Non randomised comparative studies
Exclusions:
  • Cohort
  • Case series
  • Case reports
  • Narrative summaries (including literature reviews)
Animal studies
Population size and directnessNo restrictions.
SettingAll settings.
Search StrategyThe databases to be searched are Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsychINFO
Studies will be restricted to English language only.
Review StrategyAppraisal of methodological quality:
  • The methodological quality of each study will be assessed using NICE checklists and the quality of the evidence will be assessed by GRADE for each outcome.
Synthesis of data:
  • Meta-analysis will be conducted where appropriate.
A stepwise approach is suggested:
  • If sufficient randomised evidence is identified, observational studies will not be added
  • If observational studies are considered then studies accounting for confounding factors (multivariable analysis or matching) will be considered next.
Only if insufficient randomised or multivariable data are identified will other non-randomised comparative evidence be considered

Data on the following groups will be presented separately, if the evidence allows:
  • Dementia or other cognitive impairment
  • Learning disabilities.

From: Appendix C, Clinical review protocols

Cover of Care of Dying Adults in the Last Days of Life
Care of Dying Adults in the Last Days of Life.
NICE Guideline, No. 31.
National Clinical Guideline Centre (UK).
Copyright © 2015 National Clinical Guideline Centre.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.