TABLE 5.

Clinical Trials of Intensive Glucose Control on Cardiovascular Disease Risk


TRIAL, YEARS (REF.)
INTERVENTIONCONTROLSAMPLE SIZEAVERAGE FOLLOW-UP (YEARS)CARDIOVASCULAR ENDPOINTRELATIVE RISK REDUCTIONP- VALUE
DCCT/EDIC,
1983–2013
(159,165)
Intensive insulin therapyConventional insulin therapy1,4416.5 / extended follow-up for additional 19.5 yearsTotal CVD41% / 30%NS / 0.02
UKPDS,
1977–2007
(160,161,166)
Intensive sulfonylurea- insulin, metforminConventional with diet4,20910 / extended follow-up for additional 8.5 yearsMI16% / 15%0.052 / 0.01
ADVANCE,
2001–2008
(162)
Gliclazide plus other oral drugs to achieve A1c <6.5%Standard drugs11,1405Nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or CVD death6%0.32
ACCORD,
2001–2007
(163)
Intensive therapy targeting A1c <6.0%Standard therapy for A1c 7.0%–7.9%10,2513.5Nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, or CVD death10%0.16
VADT,
2000–2008
(164)
Intensive controlStandard drugs1,7915.6Total CVD events12%0.14

Conversion formulas for A1c values are provided in the Conversions section. A1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; ACCORD, Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes; ADVANCE, Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DCCT/EDIC, Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study; MI, myocardial infarction; NS, non-significant; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study; VADT, Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.

SOURCE: References are listed within the table.

From: Heart Disease and Diabetes

Cover of Diabetes in America
Diabetes in America [Internet].
Lawrence JM, Casagrande SS, Herman WH, et al., editors.
Copyright Notice

Diabetes in America is in the public domain of the United States. You may use the work without restriction in the United States.

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.