Table 19Longitudinal Results of Satisfaction and Health Care Utilization Between Week 1 and Month 6, by Model (n = 777)

Impact estimate by model over time between wk 1 and mo 6 (95% CI)a
Specialized consultativeSpecialized longitudinalOncology embedded
Satisfaction
Recommend survivorship clinic to family or friend survivors of cancerb(Reference)0.062* (−0.005 to 0.128)0.006 (−0.050 to −0.063)
Health care use in average No. of visits
Primary care physicians(Reference)−0.229* (−0.508 to 0.050)−0.121 (−0.358 to 0.116)
Oncologists(Reference)−0.487** (−0.844 to 0.131)−0.074 (−0.377 to 0.229)
Hospital care(Reference)0.199 (−0.097 to 0.496)0.187 (−0.064 to 0.439)
Other specialists(Reference)0.137 (−0.504 to 0.778)0.079 (−0.445 to 0.603)

aModels control for age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, income, primary provider of survivorship care, and time since diagnosis. ***P < .001;

**P < .05;

*P < .01.

bThe satisfaction outcome is ranked on a 3-point continuous scale, where 1 = no, definitely not; and 3 = yes, definitely.

From: Evaluating Different Types of Cancer Survivorship Care

Cover of Evaluating Different Types of Cancer Survivorship Care
Evaluating Different Types of Cancer Survivorship Care [Internet].
Mead KH, Raskin S, Arem H, et al.
Copyright © 2019. George Washington University. All Rights Reserved.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License which permits noncommercial use and distribution provided the original author(s) and source are credited. (See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.