Spinal Muscular Atrophy, X-Linked Infantile

Synonyms: SMAX2, XL-SMA

Baumbach-Reardon L, Hunter JM, Ahearn ME, et al.

Publication Details

Estimated reading time: 18 minutes

Summary

Clinical characteristics.

X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is characterized by congenital hypotonia, areflexia, and evidence of degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells (i.e., lower motor neurons) in the spinal cord and brain stem. Often congenital contractures and/or fractures are present. Intellect is normal. Life span is significantly shortened because of progressive ventilatory insufficiency resulting from chest muscle involvement.

Diagnosis/testing.

The diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy is established in a male proband with suggestive clinical features and a hemizygous pathogenic variant in UBA1 identified by molecular genetic testing.

Management.

Treatment of manifestations: Assure adequate caloric intake by caloric supplementation and/or gastrostomy feedings; manage constipation with diet or medication; provide rigorous airway clearance techniques, secretion management, and, ideally, noninvasive ventilatory support, although tracheostomy with permanent mechanical ventilation can be considered; discuss "do not attempt to resuscitate" status with the family before respiratory failure occurs. Orthopedic consultation and physical and occupational therapy to manage contractures and progressive scoliosis. Standard treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Surveillance: Affected children should be followed at least monthly until the severity and disease course are more clearly delineated. Routine evaluations by a multidisciplinary team, including neurology, pulmonology, orthopedics, physical and occupational therapy, nutrition, and gastroenterology, as needed. Measurement of growth parameters, neurologic evaluation, nutrition/feeding assessment, evaluation of respiratory status, and physical examination for kyphosis/scoliosis at each visit.

Genetic counseling.

By definition, XL-SMA is inherited in an X-linked manner. Heterozygous females have a 50% chance of transmitting the pathogenic variant with each pregnancy. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will usually not be affected. Once the UBA1 pathogenic variant has been identified in an affected family member, carrier testing for at risk female relatives and prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing are possible.

Diagnosis

While suggestive diagnostic criteria were proposed by Dressman et al [2007] as part of inclusion criteria for a research study on this condition, no consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy have been published.

Suggestive Findings

X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy should be suspected in an individual with the following clinical, imaging, electrophysiologic, supportive laboratory, and family history findings.

Clinical features

  • Congenital hypotonia and areflexia on physical examination
  • Congenital contractures and/or fractures
  • Digital contractures at birth. These usually remain throughout the individual's life.

Neuroimaging. Spinal MRI demonstrating evidence of degeneration and loss of anterior horn cells (i.e., lower motor neurons) in the spinal cord and brain stem

Electrophysiology. Electromyogram (EMG) demonstrating denervation

Supportive laboratory findings. Normal SMN1 molecular genetic testing for autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy

Family history. A simplex case involving a male (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) or X-linked pattern of inheritance (e.g., no male-to-male transmission) in families with more than one affected individual is consistent with XL-SMA.

Establishing the Diagnosis

The diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy is established in a male proband with suggestive clinical features and a hemizygous pathogenic (or likely pathogenic) variant in UBA1 identified by molecular genetic testing (see Table 1).

Note: (1) Female carriers of XL-SMA are usually unaffected. (2) Per ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines, the terms "pathogenic variant" and "likely pathogenic variant" are synonymous in a clinical setting, meaning that both are considered diagnostic and can be used for clinical decision making [Richards et al 2015]. Reference to "pathogenic variants" in this GeneReview is understood to include likely pathogenic variants. (3) Identification of a hemizygous UBA1 variant of uncertain significance does not establish or rule out the diagnosis.

Molecular genetic testing approaches can include a combination of gene-targeted testing (single-gene testing, multigene panel) and comprehensive genomic testing (exome sequencing) depending on the phenotype.

Gene-targeted testing requires that the clinician determine which gene(s) are likely involved, whereas genomic testing does not. Because the phenotype of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy is broad, individuals with the distinctive findings described in Suggestive Findings are likely to be diagnosed using gene-targeted testing (see Option 1), whereas those with a phenotype indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders with infantile hypotonia and/or arthrogryposis are more likely to be diagnosed using genomic testing (see Option 2).

Option 1

When the phenotypic findings suggest the diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy, molecular genetic testing approaches can include single-gene testing or use of a multigene panel:

  • Single-gene testing. Sequence analysis of UBA1 detects missense, nonsense, and splice site variants and small intragenic deletions/insertions. To date, only missense and synonymous variants in exon 15 have been identified.
    Note: Lack of amplification by PCR prior to sequence analysis can suggest a putative (multi)exon or whole-gene deletion on the X chromosome in affected males; confirmation requires additional testing by gene-targeted deletion/duplication analysis. However, no deletions or duplications involving this gene have been reported as a cause of X-linked infantile SMA and some studies suggest that deletion of this gene in a male may be embryonic lethal.
  • A neuromuscular or arthrogryposis multigene panel that includes UBA1 and other genes of interest (see Differential Diagnosis) is most likely to identify the genetic cause of the condition while limiting identification of variants of uncertain significance and pathogenic variants in genes that do not explain the underlying phenotype. Note: (1) The genes included in the panel and the diagnostic sensitivity of the testing used for each gene vary by laboratory and are likely to change over time. (2) Some multigene panels may include genes not associated with the condition discussed in this GeneReview. Of note, given the rarity of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy some panels for hypotonia, neuromuscular conditions, and/or arthrogryposis may not include this gene. (3) In some laboratories, panel options may include a custom laboratory-designed panel and/or custom phenotype-focused exome analysis that includes genes specified by the clinician. (4) Methods used in a panel may include sequence analysis, deletion/duplication analysis, and/or other non-sequencing-based tests.
    For an introduction to multigene panels click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genetic tests can be found here.

Option 2

When the phenotype is indistinguishable from many other inherited disorders characterized by hypotonia, comprehensive genomic testing (which does not require the clinician to determine which gene[s] are likely involved) is the best option. Exome sequencing is most commonly used; genome sequencing is also possible.

For an introduction to comprehensive genomic testing click here. More detailed information for clinicians ordering genomic testing can be found here.

Table Icon

Table 1.

Molecular Genetic Testing Used in X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Clinical Characteristics

Clinical Description

Males

X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is characterized by severe hypotonia and areflexia with loss of anterior horn cells in the spinal cord (i.e., lower motor neurons). The disease course is similar to that of the most severe forms of classic autosomal recessive SMA (when supportive care only is given) caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in SMN1: SMA type 0 (SMA0) and SMA type I (SMA1) (see Spinal Muscular Atrophy). In SMA0, prenatal onset of weakness and poor intrauterine movement results in congenital contractures. In SMA1, motor skills regress before age six months in those receiving supportive care only; affected children who do not receive targeted therapies are never able to sit independently.

Neuromuscular. The weakness of XL-SMA is often prenatal in onset, manifest as polyhydramnios and poor movement in utero that results in congenital contractures. (Note: The term "arthrogryposis" is used to describe the presence of multiple congenital contractures of any cause.) Some neonates with XL-SMA are born with fractures that are perhaps related to poor fetal movement and subsequent bone fragility.

  • The most consistent features of XL-SMA are anterior horn cell disease and contractures (especially digital contractures) with or without fractures.
  • The weakness in XL-SMA is progressive. Affected infants may achieve some early motor milestones, but the extent varies among families.

Cognitive ability. Observed during an often-limited life span, cognition appears to be normal in those with molecularly confirmed XL-SMA.

Respiratory. The greatest morbidity in XL-SMA may be restrictive lung disease, which is usually in proportion to the child's weakness and can be further complicated by aspiration and infection [Iannaccone 2007].

  • Most children affected with XL-SMA have severe respiratory issues, due to weakness of muscles in the respiratory system.
  • The majority of children have succumbed due to complications of upper respiratory tract infections or pneumonia, and thus it is advisable to consider noninvasive ventilation and/or tracheostomy shortly after birth (see Management). Such an intervention has been proven to extend life span [Authors, personal observation]; however, the ethical implications of invasive treatment for those who are severely affected must also be considered.

Gastrointestinal/feeding issues are a frequent problem.

  • During the neonatal period, affected individuals typically have poor suck-and-swallow responses.
  • Placement of a gastrostomy tube to avoid aspiration and to provide proper nutrition is often necessary (see Management).

Other features of XL-SMA that are variably present:

  • Mild micrognathia
  • Kyphosis
  • Scoliosis
  • Cryptorchidism

Prognosis. Children with XL-SMA usually die from respiratory failure by age two years; however, the age at death ranges from the neonatal period to adolescence, the latter representing those exceptional cases in which extensive respiratory and medical support are provided. The two longest living known affected individuals received both mechanical ventilatory support and a gastrostomy tube.

Note: Individuals with a clinical picture consistent with SMA type II or type III have not been tested for pathogenic variants in UBA1; thus, it is not yet known if individuals with milder SMA phenotypes have UBA1 pathogenic variants.

Females

Female carriers of XL-SMA are usually unaffected.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

No genotype-phenotype correlations have been identified.

Nomenclature

XL-SMA has also been called:

  • X-linked lethal infantile SMA
  • Infantile X-linked SMA
  • X-linked arthrogryposis multiplex congenita
  • Distal X-linked AMC
  • X-linked arthrogryposis type I, AMCX1

Note: SMAX1 is Kennedy disease (spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy), an unrelated X-linked, adult-onset disease.

Prevalence

The prevalence of XL-SMA is unknown. To date, 14 multigenerational families with affected family members have been identified throughout North America, Europe, Mexico, and Thailand [Author, personal observation]. This includes the family described by Greenberg et al [1988].

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) caused by mutation of UBA1 includes other disorders associated with spinal muscular atrophy and/or arthrogryposis (see Table 2).

Table Icon

Table 2.

Disorders with Spinal Muscular Atrophy and/or Contractures in the Differential Diagnosis of X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Note: Arthrogryposis (defined as multiple congenital contractures in multiple body areas) is etiologically heterogeneous: underlying etiologies include central nervous system causes, neurogenic effects, fetal constraint, and intrauterine vascular disruption (e.g., amyoplasia). Congenital myasthenic syndromes (disorders of the neuromuscular junction) may also present with arthrogryposis. Many genetic disorders are associated with arthrogryposis (see Hall [2021]). Of these disorders, the subset with the greatest phenotypic overlap with XL-SMA are included in Table 2.

For a detailed review of X-linked syndromes with arthrogryposis or early contractures, see Hunter et al [2015].

Management

Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis

To establish the extent of disease and needs in an individual diagnosed with X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA), the evaluations summarized in Table 3 (if not performed as part of the evaluation that led to the diagnosis) are recommended.

Table Icon

Table 3.

Recommended Evaluations Following Initial Diagnosis in Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Treatment of Manifestations

Table Icon

Table 4.

Treatment of Manifestations in Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Surveillance

Individuals with XL-SMA should be followed regularly by a physician familiar with this condition (e.g., a clinical geneticist). Other subspecialists involved in ongoing care include a neurologist, pulmonologist, orthopedist, physical and occupational therapists, nutritionist, and gastroenterologist as needed.

Affected children should be followed at least monthly until the severity and disease course are more clearly delineated. Affected children frequently die in infancy or early childhood; their clinical status should be followed closely to optimize management, and to assure that the family has a good understanding of the progression and can make informed decisions.

Table Icon

Table 5.

Recommended Surveillance for Individuals with X-Linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Evaluation of Relatives at Risk

See Genetic Counseling for issues related to testing of at-risk relatives for genetic counseling purposes.

Therapies Under Investigation

Search ClinicalTrials.gov in the US and EU Clinical Trials Register in Europe for information on clinical studies for a wide range of diseases and conditions. Note: There may not be clinical trials for this disorder.

Genetic Counseling

Genetic counseling is the process of providing individuals and families with information on the nature, mode(s) of inheritance, and implications of genetic disorders to help them make informed medical and personal decisions. The following section deals with genetic risk assessment and the use of family history and genetic testing to clarify genetic status for family members; it is not meant to address all personal, cultural, or ethical issues that may arise or to substitute for consultation with a genetics professional. —ED.

Mode of Inheritance

By definition, X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (XL-SMA) is inherited in an X-linked manner.

Risk to Family Members

Parents of a male proband

  • The father of an affected male will not have the disorder nor will he be hemizygous for the UBA1 pathogenic variant.
  • In a family with more than one affected individual, the mother of an affected male is an obligate heterozygote. Note: If a woman has more than one affected child and no other affected relatives and if the UBA1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in her leukocyte DNA, she most likely has germline mosaicism.
  • If a male is the only affected family member (i.e., a simplex case), the mother may be a heterozygote, the affected male may have a de novo pathogenic variant (in which case the mother is not a heterozygote), or the mother may have somatic/germline mosaicism.
  • Molecular genetic testing of the mother is recommended to confirm her genetic status and to allow reliable recurrence risk assessment.

Sibs of a male proband. The risk to sibs depends on the genetic status of the mother:

  • If the mother of the proband has a UBA1 pathogenic variant, the chance of transmitting it in each pregnancy is 50%. Males who inherit the pathogenic variant will be affected; females who inherit the pathogenic variant will be heterozygotes and will usually not be affected.
  • If the proband represents a simplex case (i.e., a single occurrence in a family) and if the UBA1 pathogenic variant cannot be detected in the leukocyte DNA of the mother, the risk to sibs is unknown but presumed to be low, although greater than that of the general population because of the possibility of maternal germline mosaicism.

Offspring of a male proband

  • Males with a severe phenotype do not generally survive.
  • Males with milder phenotypes transmit the UBA1 pathogenic variant to:
    • All of their daughters, who will be heterozygotes and will usually not be affected;
    • None of their sons.

Other family members. The proband's maternal aunts may be at risk of being heterozygotes, and the aunts' offspring, depending on their sex, may be at risk of being heterozygotes or of being affected.

Heterozygote (Carrier) Detection

Carrier testing for at risk female relatives requires prior identification of the UBA1 pathogenic variant in the family.

Note: Females who are heterozygous for this X-linked disorder will usually not be affected.

Related Genetic Counseling Issues

Family planning

  • The optimal time for determination of genetic risk and discussion of the availability of prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is before pregnancy.
  • It is appropriate to offer genetic counseling (including discussion of potential risks to offspring and reproductive options) to young adults who are affected, are heterozygotes, or are at risk of being heterozygotes.

DNA banking. Because it is likely that testing methodology and our understanding of genes, pathogenic mechanisms, and diseases will improve in the future, consideration should be given to banking DNA from probands in whom a molecular diagnosis has not been confirmed (i.e., the causative pathogenic mechanism is unknown). For more information, see Huang et al [2022].

Prenatal Testing and Preimplantation Genetic Testing

Once the UBA1 pathogenic variant has been identified in the family, prenatal and preimplantation genetic testing for XL-SMA are possible.

Differences in perspective may exist among medical professionals and within families regarding the use of prenatal testing. While most centers would consider use of prenatal testing to be a personal decision, discussion of these issues may be helpful.

Resources

GeneReviews staff has selected the following disease-specific and/or umbrella support organizations and/or registries for the benefit of individuals with this disorder and their families. GeneReviews is not responsible for the information provided by other organizations. For information on selection criteria, click here.

Molecular Genetics

Information in the Molecular Genetics and OMIM tables may differ from that elsewhere in the GeneReview: tables may contain more recent information. —ED.

Table Icon

Table A.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy, X-Linked Infantile: Genes and Databases

Table Icon

Table B.

OMIM Entries for Spinal Muscular Atrophy, X-Linked Infantile (View All in OMIM)

Molecular Pathogenesis

UBA1 encodes ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme 1. The UBA1 enzyme is at the pinnacle of the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) ubiquitination cascade, initiating a series of complex and well-regulated steps that is common to all known processes that involve conjugating ubiquitin to itself or other proteins, including the essential function of tagging proteins to be targeted by the 26s proteasome. Protein degradation is as important as synthesis for protein homeostasis, and UBA1 is essential in all living cells from yeast to human. Complete loss of UBA1 is thought to be lethal, as no in vivo models of Uba1 knockout have been successfully created.

Mechanism of disease causation. Unknown; all pathogenic variants reported to date have been either missense variants or synonymous variants contained within exon 15; there is speculation that these variants may affect gene methylation.

Chapter Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the numerous clinicians and families who have supported XL-SMA disease gene discovery efforts through their cooperation throughout the years (especially Dr Louis Elsas), as well as to the laboratories of Drs Alfons Meindl and Eric Hoffman, who share in the XL-SMA disease gene discovery. The senior author is also extremely grateful to Dr Judith Hall for her expert review of this document. This work was supported in the United States by funds from the Dr John T Macdonald Center for Medical Genetics at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Peyton's Pals, the national Muscular Dystrophy Association, the Families of SMA, TGEN, Flinn Foundation of Research Arizona, and the Arizona Biomedical Commission for Research; and in Europe, by the German Ministry for Research and Education grant and FAZIT-Stiftung, Frankfurt/Main, Germany. The authors would like to dedicate this review in memory of four human geneticists who were fundamental to the early days of this research project: Dr Frank Greenberg, Dr Ronald Haun, Dr Emmanuel Shapira, and especially Dr Victor McKusick, who thought every inherited disorder, common or rare, was worth recognition and further investigation.

Author History

Mary Ellen Ahearn, MS (2008-present)
Lisa Baumbach-Reardon, PhD, FACMG (2008-present)
JM Hunter, PhD, FACMG (2021-present)
Miranda Pfautsch (2021-present)
Stephanie J Sacharow, MD; Boston Children's Hospital (2008-2021)

Revision History

  • 9 May 2024 (ma) Revision: VEXAS syndrome added to Genetically Related Disorders
  • 29 July 2021 (ma) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 13 September 2012 (me) Comprehensive update posted live
  • 30 October 2008 (me) Review posted live
  • 10 July 2008 (lbr) Original submission

References

Literature Cited

  • Balak CD, Hunter JM, Ahearn ME, Wiley D, D'urso G, Baumbach-Reardon L. Functional characterizations of rare UBA1 variants in X-linked spinal muscular atrophy. F1000Res. 2017;6:1636. [PMC free article: PMC5615770] [PubMed: 29034082]

  • Beck DB, Ferrada MA, Sikora KA, Ombrello AK, Collins JC, Pei W, Balanda N, Ross DL, Ospina Cardona D, Wu Z, Patel B, Manthiram K, Groarke EM, Gutierrez-Rodrigues F, Hoffmann P, Rosenzweig S, Nakabo S, Dillon LW, Hourigan CS, Tsai WL, Gupta S, Carmona-Rivera C, Asmar AJ, Xu L, Oda H, Goodspeed W, Barron KS, Nehrebecky M, Jones A, Laird RS, Deuitch N, Rowczenio D, Rominger E, Wells KV, Lee CR, Wang W, Trick M, Mullikin J, Wigerblad G, Brooks S, Dell'Orso S, Deng Z, Chae JJ, Dulau-Florea A, Malicdan MCV, Novacic D, Colbert RA, Kaplan MJ, Gadina M, Savic S, Lachmann HJ, Abu-Asab M, Solomon BD, Retterer K, Gahl WA, Burgess SM, Aksentijevich I, Young NS, Calvo KR, Werner A, Kastner DL, Grayson PC. Somatic mutations in UBA1 and severe adult-onset autoinflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2628-38. [PMC free article: PMC7847551] [PubMed: 33108101]

  • Dlamini N, Josifova DJ, Paine SM, Wraige E, Pitt M, Murphy AJ, King A, Buk S, Smith F, Abbs S, Sewry C, Jacques TS, Jungbluth H. Clinical and neuropathological features of X-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) associated with a novel mutation in the UBA1 gene. Neuromuscul Disord. 2013;23:391-8. [PubMed: 23518311]

  • Dressman D, Ahearn ME, Yariz KO, Basterrecha H, Martínez F, Palau F, Barmada MM, Clark RD, Meindl A, Wirth B, Hoffman EP, Baumbach-Reardon L. X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy: clinical definition and molecular mapping. Genet Med. 2007;9:52-60. [PubMed: 17224690]

  • Greenberg F, Fenolio KR, Hejtmancik JF, Armstrong D, Willis JK, Shapira E, Huntington HW, Haun RL. X-linked Infantile Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Am J Dis Child. 1988;142:217-9. [PubMed: 3341327]

  • Hall JG. Arthrogryposis. In: Carey JC, Battaglia A, Veskochil D, Cassidy SB, eds. Cassidy and Allanson's Management of Genetic Syndromes. 4 ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons; 2021:75-91.

  • Huang SJ, Amendola LM, Sternen DL. Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on. J Community Genet. 2022;13:389-97. [PMC free article: PMC9314484] [PubMed: 35834113]

  • Hunter JM, Kiefer J, Balak CD, Jooma S, Ahearn ME, Hall JG, Baumbach-Reardon L. Review of X-linked syndromes with arthrogryposis or early contractures – aid to diagnosis and pathway identification. Am J Med Genet A. 2015;167A:931-73. [PubMed: 25790323]

  • Iannaccone ST. Modern management of spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:974-8. [PubMed: 17761652]

  • Jędrzejowska M, Jakubowska-Pietkiewicz E, Kostera-Pruszczyk A. X-linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) caused by de novo c.1731C>T substitution in the UBA1 gene. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25:661-6. [PubMed: 26028276]

  • Ramser J, Ahearn ME, Lenski C, Yariz K, Hellebrand H, von Rhein M, Clark RD, Schmutzler RK, Lichtner P, Hoffman EP, Meindl A, Baumbach-Reardon L. Rare missense and synonymous variants in UBE1 are associated with X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:188-93. [PMC free article: PMC2253959] [PubMed: 18179898]

  • Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405-24. [PMC free article: PMC4544753] [PubMed: 25741868]

  • Shaughnessy N, Forman EB, O'Rourke D, Lynch SA, Lynch B. X-linked infantile spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2) caused by novel c.1681G>A substitution in the UBA1 gene, expanding the phenotype. Neuromuscul Disord. 2020;30:35-7. [PubMed: 31932168]

  • Wang CH, Finkel RS, Bertini ES, Schroth M, Simonds A, Wong B, Aloysius A, Morrison L, Main M, Crawford TO, Trela A; Participants of the International Conference on SMA Standard of Care. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22:1027-49. [PubMed: 17761659]

  • Wang XH, Zhang LM, Yang X, Zhou SZ. A pathogenic missense variant (c.1617G>A, p.Met539Ile) in UBA1 causing infantile X-Linked spinal muscular atrophy (SMAX2). Front Pediatr. 2020;8:64. [PMC free article: PMC7059435] [PubMed: 32181232]