|
Status |
Public on Sep 15, 2010 |
Title |
IHA_69_2 |
Sample type |
genomic |
|
|
Channel 1 |
Source name |
Input fraction from IHA_69_2
|
Organism |
Homo sapiens |
Characteristics |
cell type: lymphocyte bmi: 33.8105180096942 Sex: male subject_id: 69 timepoint: 1991 hybe_date: 20090729
|
Extracted molecule |
genomic DNA |
Extraction protocol |
Genomic DNA (gDNA) were isolated using DNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample, 1~5 µg of genomic DNA was sheared into 1.6-3kb DNA size fragments, digested with the endonuclease McrBC, and fractionated on a 1% agarose gel alongside the sheared input (UT) fraction to enrich for the methyl-depleted (MD) fraction. The UT and MD fractions were purified and whole genome amplified using the WGA2 kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
|
Label |
Cy3
|
Label protocol |
2 µg of DNA was directly labeled by Klenow (New England Biolabs) random priming with Cy3 nonamers for the input (UT) fraction and Cy5 nonamers for the methyl-depleted (MD) fraction per manufacturer's protocol.
|
|
|
Channel 2 |
Source name |
Methyl-depleted fraction from IHA_69_2
|
Organism |
Homo sapiens |
Characteristics |
cell type: lymphocyte bmi: 33.8105180096942 Sex: male subject_id: 69 timepoint: 1991 hybe_date: 20090729
|
Extracted molecule |
genomic DNA |
Extraction protocol |
Genomic DNA (gDNA) were isolated using DNeasy kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For each sample, 1~5 µg of genomic DNA was sheared into 1.6-3kb DNA size fragments, digested with the endonuclease McrBC, and fractionated on a 1% agarose gel alongside the sheared input (UT) fraction to enrich for the methyl-depleted (MD) fraction. The UT and MD fractions were purified and whole genome amplified using the WGA2 kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
|
Label |
Cy5
|
Label protocol |
2 µg of DNA was directly labeled by Klenow (New England Biolabs) random priming with Cy3 nonamers for the input (UT) fraction and Cy5 nonamers for the methyl-depleted (MD) fraction per manufacturer's protocol.
|
|
|
|
Hybridization protocol |
The labeled DNA was precipitated with 0.1 volume 5M NaCl and 1 volume isopropanol, and hybridized in NimbleGen Hybridization solution master mix. Arrays were hybridized in Maui hybridization stations for 16-20 h at 42C, and washes were completed using manufacturer's protocols.
|
Scan protocol |
Arrays were scanned on a GenePix 4000B scanner per manufacturer's protocol.
|
Description |
IHA_69_2 input IHA_69_2 methyl-depleted
|
Data processing |
Arrays were processed using Nimblescan 2.4 software. The data processing methods are described in Ayree, Z. Wu, C. Ladd-Acosta, B. Herb, A. Feinberg, S. Yegnasubramanian, R. Irizarry. Accurate genome-scale percentage DNA methylation estimates from microarray data. Biostatistics, (2010). Briefly, processing involved background correction using a modified RMA convolution model, a modified control-probe loess procedure for within-array normalization, between-array normalization using quantile normalization, and estimation of percentages.
|
|
|
Submission date |
Sep 09, 2010 |
Last update date |
Sep 10, 2010 |
Contact name |
Peter Murakami |
E-mail(s) |
[email protected]
|
Organization name |
Johns Hopkins University
|
Department |
Center for Epigenetics
|
Street address |
855 N Wolfe St, Rangos 580
|
City |
Baltimore |
State/province |
MD |
ZIP/Postal code |
21205 |
Country |
USA |
|
|
Platform ID |
GPL9275 |
Series (1) |
GSE23858 |
DNA methylation data from non-immortalized lymphocyte samples from participants of the AGES Reykjavik Study |
|