Sample | Title | Value | Rank |
GSM4490 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED1Cy5 740600GEO | 1.71617 | 98 |
GSM4491 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED2Cy5 700600GEO | 2.51028 | 99 |
GSM4492 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED3Cy5 620620GEO | 2.44732 | 99 |
GSM4508 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG1Cy5 710520GEO | -0.313275 | 33 |
GSM4515 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG2Cy5 710530GEO | -1.09779 | 5 |
GSM4520 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG3Cy5 800500GEO | -1.95711 | 6 |
GSM4524 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD1Cy5 740600GEO | -2.24639 | 4 |
GSM4530 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD2Cy5 840640GEO | -2.11433 | 5 |
GSM4534 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD3Cy5 800650GEO | -2.42795 | 4 |
GSM4541 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG1Cy5 640620GEO | -1.27524 | 5 |
GSM4547 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG2Cy5 630620GEO | -2.47684 | 1 |
GSM4552 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG3Cy5 710540GEO | -2.57228 | 2 |
GSM4559 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS1Cy5 610620GEO | -2.33974 | 3 |
GSM4564 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS2Cy5 700600GEO | -4.23688 | 1 |
GSM4568 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS3Cy5 730600GEO | -3.93956 | 1 |