Sample | Title | Value | Rank |
GSM4490 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED1Cy5 740600GEO | -0.476628 | 30 |
GSM4491 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED2Cy5 700600GEO | -1.78862 | 2 |
GSM4492 | wholeRefCy3 vs ED3Cy5 620620GEO | -0.541585 | 24 |
GSM4508 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG1Cy5 710520GEO | -3.57862 | 1 |
GSM4515 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG2Cy5 710530GEO | -3.60155 | 1 |
GSM4520 | wholeRefCy3 vs SG3Cy5 800500GEO | -2.97005 | 2 |
GSM4524 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD1Cy5 740600GEO | -3.07551 | 2 |
GSM4530 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD2Cy5 840640GEO | -4.1429 | 1 |
GSM4534 | wholeRefCy3 vs WD3Cy5 800650GEO | -3.5959 | 1 |
GSM4541 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG1Cy5 640620GEO | -1.44568 | 4 |
GSM4547 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG2Cy5 630620GEO | -0.2127 | 32 |
GSM4552 | wholeRefCy3 vs MG3Cy5 710540GEO | -1.87184 | 4 |
GSM4559 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS1Cy5 610620GEO | -2.31702 | 3 |
GSM4564 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS2Cy5 700600GEO | -3.10563 | 2 |
GSM4568 | wholeRefCy3 vs CNS3Cy5 730600GEO | -2.75268 | 4 |