Abstract
Angelman syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss of function of the maternally expressed UBE3A gene. Treatments for the main manifestations, including cognitive dysfunction or epilepsy, are still under development. Recently, the Cl− importer Na+-K+-Cl− cotransporter 1 (NKCC1) and the Cl− exporter K+-Cl− cotransporter 2 (KCC2) have garnered attention as therapeutic targets for many neurological disorders. Dysregulation of neuronal intracellular Cl− concentration ([Cl−]i) is generally regarded as one of the mechanisms underlying neuronal dysfunction caused by imbalanced expression of these cation-chloride cotransporters (CCCs). Here, we analyzed the regulation of [Cl−]i and the effects of bumetanide, an NKCC1 inhibitor, in Angelman syndrome models (Ube3am−/p+ mice). We observed increased NKCC1 expression and decreased KCC2 expression in the hippocampi of Ube3am−/p+ mice. The average [Cl−]i of CA1 pyramidal neurons was not significantly different but demonstrated greater variance in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Tonic GABAA receptor-mediated Cl− conductance was reduced, which may have contributed to maintaining the normal average [Cl−]i. Bumetanide administration restores cognitive dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Seizure susceptibility was also reduced regardless of the genotype. These results suggest that an imbalanced expression of CCCs is involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of Ube3am−/p+ mice, although the average [Cl−]i is not altered. The blockage of NKCC1 may be a potential therapeutic strategy for patients with Angelman syndrome.
Subject terms: Diseases of the nervous system, Transporters in the nervous system
Introduction
Angelman syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by the loss of function of the maternally expressed gene UBE3A, located on chromosome 15q11–q131. The primary manifestations are developmental delay, language impairment, ataxic gait, epilepsy, and characteristic behaviors, such as paroxysmal laughter2,3. The phenotypes, including cognitive function impairment, motor dysfunction, and abnormalities seen on electroencephalogram, are well replicated in AS model mice, which lack maternal copies of the Ube3a gene (Ube3am–/p+)4–8. While the generation of these mouse models has contributed to remarkable progress in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of AS7,9–11, therapeutics for curing AS symptoms are still under development.
Recent evidence has suggested that the Na+-K+-Cl+ cotransporter 1 (NKCC1), which transports Cl− into the cell, is an attractive therapeutic target for ameliorating the symptoms of a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders, including neurodevelopmental disorders and epilepsy12–16. NKCC1 is widely expressed in multiple cell types, including neurons in the central nervous system (CNS), and is particularly involved in regulating the neuronal intracellular Cl− concentration ([Cl−]i17 in cooperation with K+-Cl− cotransporter 2 (KCC2), which facilitates Cl− efflux18. Neuronal NKCC1 expression and function are upregulated from the prenatal to early postnatal period and gradually decrease with development. In contrast, KCC2 is dominant in mature neurons19,20. Various cell signaling cascades regulate changes in the expression of these cation-chloride cotransporters (CCCs) according to developmental and pathophysiological conditions, and modulate GABA-mediated signaling by regulating [Cl−]i21,22. A shift in the Cl− equilibrium potential towards positive values accompanied by an increased NKCC1/KCC2 expression ratio have been reported in various mouse models of genetic neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X syndrome12, Rett syndrome23, and Down syndrome13, as well as in tissues derived from human patients with tuberous sclerosis24. Recent studies have shown that the reduction of upregulated NKCC1 expression by RNA interference successfully rescued the core symptoms of CNS disorders in mouse models of genetic diseases25,26. Such dysregulation of CCCs activity may be a common pathophysiological mechanism underlying genetic neurodevelopmental disorders.
Bumetanide, a loop diuretic that inhibits renal Na+-K+-Cl+ cotransporter 2, is also known to inhibit NKCC1. In vitro physiological experiments have shown that blocking NKCC1 with bumetanide decreases neuronal [Cl−]i, which reinforces GABA-mediated inhibitory synaptic transmission by increasing the driving force for Cl−17,20. These lines of evidence are widely regarded as indicating the pharmacological mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of systemic administration of bumetanide on neurological dysfunction in various rodent models of neurodevelopmental disorders12,13, neurodegenerative disorders15, and epilepsy27. Conversely, several researchers have argued that the effects of NKCC1 blockage by systemic administration of bumetanide cannot be simply explained by the readjustment of increased neuronal [Cl−]i, as NKCC1 is ubiquitously expressed in non-neuron brain cells, including glial cells and choroid plexus epithelial cells16.
Bumetanide administration in human clinical trials has yielded conflicting results. While pilot trials for autism spectrum disorder have shown that bumetanide administration can improve behavioral problems without inducing any severe side effects28,29, a more recent study failed to show superior effects to a placebo30. One of the reasons for this discrepancy may be the limited CNS penetration of bumetanide27. Unlike preclinical studies using rodent models, it is difficult to obtain a sufficient concentration to inhibit NKCC1 in the brain under clinical trials, whose protocol is similar to that of diuretic purposes. A novel NKCC1 inhibitor that penetrates the CNS more efficiently and is more specific to NKCC1 than bumetanide is currently under development16,31.
Here, we analyzed the effects of homeostatic [Cl−]i regulation and bumetanide on neuronal dysfunction in Ube3am–/p+ mice. Our data revealed the presence of increased NKCC1 and decreased KCC2 expression in the hippocampi of Ube3am–/p+ mice. Although the steady-state [Cl−]i of CA1 pyramidal neurons was not significantly different on average, it demonstrated significantly more variance in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Chronic administration of bumetanide at doses sufficient to inhibit brain NKCC1, ameliorated novel object recognition dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice. This treatment was also effective at reducing susceptibility to pharmacologically induced seizures in both Ube3am−/p+ mice and littermate controls. These findings suggest that blocking NKCC1 activity may be a potential therapeutic strategy for improving cognitive dysfunction and epilepsy in individuals with AS.
Results
CCCs expression is dysregulated in the hippocampus of Ube3am−/p+ mice
To evaluate the homeostatic regulation of [Cl−]i in Ube3am−/p+ mice, we first studied the protein levels of two CCCs, the Cl− importer NKCC1 and the Cl− exporter KCC2, in the hippocampus of mature mice (3–5 months old). Immunoblot analyses of CCCs revealed a significant increase in NKCC1 expression in Ube3am−/p+ mice (14% increase compared to wild-type (WT) mice, p = 0.0042, n = 16 for Ube3am−/p+ mice and n = 13 for WT; Fig. 1A). Conversely, the KCC2 levels were decreased in Ube3am−/p+ mice (18% decrease compared to those in WT mice, p = 0.0222; Fig. 1A). Previous studies have shown that during development, KCC2 expression begins to dominate NKCC1 expression, resulting in net Cl− efflux via CCCs in mature neurons. The imbalance in NKCC1/KCC2 expression suggests impairment of this regulatory mechanism for [Cl−]i in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
To determine whether [Cl−]i is indeed altered by this dysregulation of CCCs, we performed gramicidin perforated patch-clamp recordings in acute hippocampal slices prepared from mice at P24–32 days. Based on the Nernst equation, the [Cl−]i was calculated using the measured EGABA. Contrary to the expectation from the CCC expression results, we observed no significant difference in steady-state [Cl−]i (WT:9.5 ± 0.6 mM vs. Ube3am−/p+:10.9 ± 1.0 mM, p = 0.2161; Fig. 1B) or EGABA (WT: − 70.7 ± 1.5 mV vs. Ube3am−/p+: − 67.9 ± 2.4 mV, p = 0.3321) between WT and Ube3am−/p+ mice. Alternatively, the [Cl−]i of Ube3am−/p+ mice demonstrated significantly more variance than that of WT mice (test for equality of variance, F = 3.128, p < 0.0051). The resting membrane potential also showed no difference (WT: − 61.6 ± 1.0 mV vs. Ube3am−/p+: − 61.8 ± 1.6 mV, p = 0.8342).
The lack of a difference in neuronal [Cl−]i despite the increase in whole-hippocampal NKCC1 expression may imply that the upregulation of NKCC1 expression occurs predominantly in non-neuronal cells owing to its low expression in neuronal cells compared to other cell types in the brain16. Alternatively, the net [Cl−]i increase due to imbalanced CCCs might be counterbalanced by deregulation of other membrane Cl− transport mechanisms in Ube3am−/p+ mice. This interpretation might be supported by the variance in [Cl−]i values in Ube3am−p+ mice.
Tonic GABAA receptor-mediated Cl− conductance is decreased in the CA1 pyramidal neurons of Ube3am−/p+ mice
While [Cl−]i modification by CCCs directly influences GABAA receptor-mediated signal transmission, GABAA receptor-mediated Cl− conductance itself can also alter [Cl−]i32–34,39. To gain a deeper understanding of homeostatic [Cl−]i regulation in Ube3am−/p+ mice, we next evaluated the properties of GABAA receptor-mediated signal transmission onto CA1 pyramidal neurons in acute slices prepared from mice at P24–32 days.
We recorded mIPSCs using whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings in the presence of tetrodotoxin and observed no significant differences in the frequency, amplitude, or time kinetics between WT and Ube3am−/p+ mice (Fig. 2A–C, Table 1). Short-term synaptic plasticity, evaluated by the average paired-pulse ratio of evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents, was also unaltered in the Ube3am−/p+ mice (Table 1). Similar results were previously reported in other brain regions, including the layer 2/3 of the visual cortex9 and granule cell layer of the cerebellum7 of young adult Ube3am−/p+ mice. In contrast, the frequency of mEPSCs was significantly decreased in Ube3am−/p+ mice (Table 1), in accordance with previous reports35,36. Our observations suggest that GABAA receptor-mediated synaptic properties, including the strength and number of synapses, postsynaptic receptor properties, and presynaptic transmitter release, are maintained in Ube3am−/p+ mice at this age.
Table 1.
WT | Ube3am−/p+ | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
mEPSC frequency (n/min) | 18.10 ± 3.30 (n = 8) | 7.90 ± 1.40 (n = 8) | < 0.05 |
mEPSC amplitude (pA) | 11.40 ± 0.63 (n = 8) | 10.46 ± 0.85 (n = 8) | 0.38 |
mEPSC rise time (ms) | 3.76 ± 0.15 (n = 8) | 3.90 ± 0.15 (n = 8) | 0.51 |
mEPSC decay (ms) | 4.73 ± 0.28 (n = 8) | 4.66 ± 0.42 (n = 8) | 0.26 |
PPR for evoked EPSCs | 1.36 ± 0.06 (n = 12) | 1.55 ± 0.09 (n = 10) | 0.22 |
mIPSC frequency (n/s) | 4.90 ± 0.58 (n = 9) | 4.71 ± 0.50 (n = 10) | 0.81 |
mIPSC amplitude (pA) | 21.70 ± 1.20 (n = 9) | 20.20 ± 2.30 (n = 10) | 0.61 |
mIPSC rise time (ms) | 2.69 ± 0.11 (n = 9) | 2.39 ± 0.15 (n = 10) | 0.13 |
mIPSC decay (ms) | 8.83 ± 0.39 (n = 9) | 7.79 ± 0.77 (n = 10) | 0.26 |
PPR for evoked IPSCs | 0.78 ± 0.03 (n = 10) | 0.82 ± 0.05 (n = 10) | 0.43 |
mEPSC miniature excitatory postsynaptic current, mIPSC miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current, PPR paired-pulse ratio, WT wild-type.
The mammalian CNS has two forms of inhibition: phasic (synaptic) inhibition and tonic inhibition. Tonic inhibition is mediated by GABAA receptors expressed in the extrasynaptic membrane, which are tonically activated by ambient GABA in the extrasynaptic space37. We and other groups have previously shown that tonic inhibition of cerebellar granule cells is significantly decreased in Ube3am−/p+ mice7,38. In accordance with these reports, tonic GABAA receptor-mediated currents of CA1 pyramidal neurons were significantly reduced in Ube3am−/p+ mice compared to those in WT animals (p = 0.0443, Fig. 2D, E). GABAA receptor-mediated tonic Cl− flux can alter [Cl−]i and diminish the driving force for Cl−, which is initially determined by active Cl− transport and membrane potential. Cl− imaging techniques have demonstrated that blocking tonic inhibition results in a decrease in [Cl−]i in mature cerebellar granule cells39. Thus, a decrease in tonic Cl− conductance may be one of the mechanisms underlying the lack of significant differences in neuronal [Cl−]i despite the imbalanced CCC expression, and could explain the variance of [Cl−]i values in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
Chronic administration of bumetanide improves cognitive dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice
The increase in NKCC1 expression suggests a therapeutic effect of bumetanide on neuronal dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Thus, we evaluated the effects of chronic bumetanide administration (21–28 days) on behavior, seizure susceptibility, and EEG activity in Ube3am−/p+ mice (6–8 months old). A previous study27 showed that it is difficult to maintain effective bumetanide concentrations in the brain when the drug is administered only once or twice a day due to the rapid drug elimination and low brain penetration in rodents. Therefore, we utilized osmotic pumps to allow the continuous delivery of bumetanide40 at a flow rate adjusted to exceed the target plasma concentration, as previously shown27. This protocol induced substantial diuretic effects (1.5 ± 0.2 mL/24 h in WT treated with control vehicle vs. 4.0 ± 0.9 mL/24 h in WT treated with bumetanide, p = 0.0215, n = 8 for each group), but did not cause obvious adverse effects as shown previously27.
As a phenotype of impaired cognitive function, Ube3am−/p+ mice showed poor novelty discrimination in the novel object recognition test (main effect of factor genotype: F [1,56] = 10.51, p = 0.0020, WT treated with control vehicle (WT Veh) vs. Ube3am−/p+ treated with control vehicle (Ube3am−/p+ Veh): p = 0.0027, Fig. 3A), consistent with a previous report41. We observed a significant interaction between the factors, genotype and drug in novelty discrimination capability (F [1,56] = 4.115, p = 0.0473). Subsequent post-hoc analysis revealed that Ube3am−/p+ mice treated with bumetanide (Ube3am−/p+ Bum) showed higher novelty discrimination capability than Ube3am−/p+ Veh-treated mice (p = 0.0468), whereas no significant difference was detected between bumetanide-treated (WT Bum) and WT Veh (p = 0.7594). These results indicate that chronic administration of bumetanide effectively improved cognitive dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
The effect of bumetanide on motor dysfunction was evaluated using a rotarod test. As reported previously5,7,41, Ube3am−/p+ mice spent a shorter time on an accelerating rotarod (main effect of factor genotype: F [1, 57] = 80.85, p < 0.0001) with a lower time increment in repetitive trials (interaction between factor genotype and time: F [7, 399] = 6.573, p < 0.0001) than WT animals. Chronic administration of bumetanide did not alter the time spent on the rotarod in either WT or Ube3am−/p+ mice (main effect of factor drug: F [1, 57] = 0.02198, p = 0.8827; interaction between genotype and drug: F [1, 57] = 0.4161, p = 0.421; interaction among time, genotype, and drug: F [7, 399] = 0.6594, p = 0.7065; Fig. 3B).
Similar to the results of the rotarod test, treatment with bumetanide did not improve the reduced locomotor activity of Ube3am−/p+ mice (analyzed by total distance traveled in the open field test; main effect of genotype factor: F [1, 57] = 80.85, p < 0.0001; WT Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Veh: p < 0.0001; main effect of drug factor: F [1, 63] = 3.665, p = 0.0601; interaction between genotype and drug: F [1, 63] = 0.05939, p = 0.8244, Ube3am−/p+ Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Bum: p = 0.8890; Fig. 3C). Ube3am−/p+ mice also showed reduced distance traveled in the center region relative to the total distance (main effect of factor genotype: F [1, 63] = 21.20, p < 0.0001, WT Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Veh: p = 0.0045), a parameter commonly used to evaluate anxiety. This anxiety-like behavior could not be rescued by bumetanide (main effect of drug factor: F [1, 63] = 0.0255, p = 0.8811; interaction between genotype and drug: F [1, 63] = 0.05939, p = 0.8083, Ube3am−/p+ Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Bum: p = 0.9999; Fig. 3C).
Bumetanide raises the seizure threshold in both Ube3am−/p+ and WT mice
Most previous studies have reported that seizure susceptibility, as evaluated by an acute seizure induction paradigm, is comparable between WT and Ube3am−/p+ of the C57BL/6 strain at a young adult age4,41. We recently reported that, in middle-aged mice instead of young adult C57BL/6 mice, the seizure susceptibility induced by flurothyl inhalation was significantly higher in Ube3am−/p+ mice than in WT animals8. This is in accordance with the clinical observation that epilepsy symptoms become more pronounced with age after adolescence in patients with AS42,43. Thus, we evaluated the effects of bumetanide on seizure susceptibility induced by flurothyl inhalation in middle-aged Ube3am−/p+ mice (6–12 months old). As shown previously, the latencies of myoclonic and tonic seizures were both significantly shorter in Ube3am−/p+ mice than in WT mice (myoclonic seizure: main effect of genotype: F [1, 56] = 99.18, p < 0.0001, WT Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Veh: p < 0.0001). Chronic administration of bumetanide significantly lengthened the latency in both WT and Ube3am−/p+ mice (myoclonic seizure: main effect of drug: F [1, 56] = 99.18, p < 0.0001; WT Veh vs. WT Bum, p = 0.002; Ube3am−/p+ Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Bum: p = 0.0005; tonic seizure: main effect of drug: F [1, 56] = 14.88, p = 0.0003; WT Veh vs. WT Bum: p = 0.0380, Ube3am−/p+ Veh vs. Ube3am−/p+ Bum: p = 0.0446; Fig. 4A). No significant interaction was observed between genotype and drug, suggesting that flurothyl-induced seizure activity may involve NKCC1 activation, regardless of genotype.
Next, we evaluated the effects of bumetanide on the spontaneous EEG activity in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Replicating the EEG characteristics of human individuals with AS, long-term subdural EEG recordings indicated that Ube3am−/p+ mice showed a higher probability of epileptic discharges (WT vs. Ube3am−/p+: p = 0.0160; Fig. 4B) and higher power in low-frequency bands during the awake state (WT vs. Ube3am−/p+, δ band: p = 0.040, θ band: p = 0.0153, α band: p = 0.0058; Fig. 4C), consistent with previous reports5,41,44. The frequency of epileptic discharges and power in low-frequency bands were not altered by chronic bumetanide administration in Ube3am−/p+ mice (Ube3am−/p+ before Bum vs. Ube3am−/p+ after Bum; δ band: p = 0.770; θ band: p = 0.4572; α band: p = 0.1279, β band: p = 0.3090; Fig. 4C). These results suggest that imbalanced CCC expression is not the sole cause of EEG abnormalities in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
Discussion
UBE3A, the causal gene of AS, encodes the E6AP (UBE3A) protein, an E3 ubiquitin ligase in the protein-proteasome pathway. While several neuronal proteins have been identified as specific substrates for ubiquitination by UBE3A45, accumulating evidence has indicated that several neuronal cell signaling pathways are indirectly altered by UBE3A loss of function11. This implies that an enormous number of proteins can be dysregulated in AS, and that AS pathophysiology may therefore differ according to phenotype10. Identifying pathogenic proteins that enable the pharmacological manipulation of dysfunction is important for the evaluation of therapeutic strategies in AS. Therefore, we focused on CCCs and found that their expression was aberrantly dysregulated in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Additionally, chronic administration of bumetanide ameliorated cognitive dysfunction in Ube3am−/p+ mice, suggesting that imbalanced expression of CCCs contributes to the phenotype of cognitive dysfunction in AS. Although there is no evidence showing a direct interaction between UBE3A and CCCs, these results imply that UBE3A can affect portions of the cell signaling pathways that regulate CCCs alterations in response to developmental changes or pathophysiological conditions22. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling, which facilitates CCCs alternation during development46, may be a candidate because the impairment of TrkB signaling has been shown in Ube3am−/p+ mice47. However, details of the interaction between UBE3A and BDNF-TrkB signaling are not fully understood. Thus, further analysis is required to clarify the mechanism underlying dysregulation of CCCs expression in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
Similar ameliorating effects of bumetanide on cognitive impairment have been reported in other mouse models of CNS diseases, including Down syndrome13 and Huntington’s disease15. In contrast to prior studies that demonstrated an increased mean [Cl−]i accompanied by increased NKCC1 expression, the [Cl−]i value did not differ between WT and Ube3am−/p+. While electroneutral CCCs are the primary determinants of neuronal [Cl−]i, passive Cl− conductance via Cl− channels and anion exchangers has been proposed as an additional regulator of [Cl−]i33. In particular, previous studies have indicated that both synaptic and tonic GABAA receptor conductance can alter [Cl−]i under physiological conditions32–34,39. In the present study, we showed that tonic GABAA receptor-mediated conductance decreased in CA1 pyramidal neurons. Previously, we reported an increase in GABA transporter 1 expression and subsequent reduction in ambient GABA as a mechanism of decreased tonic inhibition in the cerebellum of Ube3am−/p+ mice7. Because this GABA transporter is also expressed in the hippocampus, a similar mechanism may be responsible for decreased tonic inhibition in the hippocampus. Given the variability of [Cl−]i in neurons with inward- or outward-directed driving forces for Cl−, the decrease in passive tonic Cl− influx or efflux, respectively, via extrasynaptic GABAA receptors may stabilize the [Cl−]i generated by the imbalance in CCCs expression. This may explain the comparable average [Cl−]i, as well as its increased variance, in Ube3am−/p+ mice. Conversely, the imbalanced CCCs expression may be subsequent to the reduced Cl− loading, due to decreased tonic Cl− conductance33. Such a counterbalancing mechanism is not fully understood and is of future research interest. The variance in the [Cl−]i distribution can be reduced by bumetanide because its effect on decreasing [Cl−]i is more pronounced in individual neurons with a higher initial [Cl−]i48. Thus, our results imply that a higher steady-state [Cl−]i in a part of the neuronal population can cause cognitive impairment even if the average [Cl−]i is not different. To prove this speculation, [Cl−]i and its pharmacological changes should be evaluated in a much larger number of neurons using the Cl− imaging technique in future research.
To discuss the relationship between the results of western blotting for CCCs and neuronal [Cl−]i, we need to consider the distribution of NKCC1 expression in the brain. NKCC1 is demonstrably expressed in a variety of cells in the brain including glial cells, neurons and cells outside the parenchyma49. However, its localization in the forebrain is still under debate as the results of immunohistochemistry have been inconsistent across studies50. Some research groups argue that it is more dominant in non-neuronal cells than in neurons and that the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of bumetanide is therefore more complicated16. In this case, the imbalance in neuronal CCC expression would be milder than indicated by the results of western blotting, which may explain the lack of significant difference in [Cl−]i. The controversy may arise from the lack of reliable NKCC1 antibodies for immunohistochemistry50. A feature study investigating the distribution of increased NKCC1 levels using a novel NKCC1 antibody is required to elucidate the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects of bumetanide in Ube3am−/p+ mice.
Although bumetanide was also effective in increasing the seizure threshold in Ube3am−/p+ mice, its efficacy in these mice was comparable to that in WT mice, indicating that flurothyl-induced seizure activity may involve NKCC1 activation, regardless of genotype. In contrast, EEG abnormalities, including epileptic spike discharges and higher power in the lower frequency bands, were not improved by bumetanide. A previous study in an experimental epilepsy model revealed the antiepileptic effects of low-dose bumetanide, whose concentration in the brain was incompatible with NKCC1 inhibition51, suggesting that target(s) other than NKCC1 may contribute to the antiepileptic effect of bumetanide. Further investigations are required to clarify the mechanisms underlying the bumetanide-induced reduction in seizure susceptibility.
In contrast to cognitive dysfunction, motor dysfunction and EEG abnormalities of Ube3am−/p+ were not affected by the application of bumetanide. This discrepancy may be correlated with previous findings that NKCC1 distribution differs by region at the messenger RNA level52. These discrepant effects of bumetanide among symptoms are in line with the speculation that AS pathophysiological mechanisms induced by UBE3A deficiency differ according to the phenotype10. To date, the dysregulation of a variety of cation ion channels or transporters including voltage-dependent big potassium (BK) channels53, the Ca2+-activated small conductance potassium channel (SK2)54, Na/K-ATPase (α1-NaKA) and the Na+ channel (Nav1.6)55 have been identified as pathophysiological mechanisms in AS models. Because CCCs and these cation channel/transporters can functionally interact with each other, the therapeutic effects of CCCs inhibition may be affected by the diverse pathophysiology, which may also explain the inconsistent results of bumetanide. Further research investigating the crosstalk of multiple pathophysiology may contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying a variety of neuronal dysfunctions in AS.
In this study, we provide evidence that bumetanide alleviates the symptoms of AS. Off-label use of bumetanide has been tested in clinical trials in a variety of common CNS diseases, including epilepsy, ASD, tuberous sclerosis, and schizophrenia, and its efficacy is still controversial30. One of the main limitations of bumetanide is its low brain penetrance across the blood–brain barrier27. Clinical doses of bumetanide approved as a diuretic are insufficient to inhibit brain NKCC1. To overcome this issue, prodrugs of bumetanide, which show more efficient brain permeability and/or NKCC1 selectivity, are currently under development16,31. The efficacy of bumetanide was not marked in this study, despite its high-dose administration. Due to compliance and adverse effects, our results are difficult to translate into clinical applications directly. Nevertheless, our findings highlight the pathophysiological involvement of imbalanced CCCs expression in AS and may lead to novel therapeutic strategies for ameliorating the symptoms of AS.
Methods
Animals
C57BL/6 mice were used to generate mice carrying a Ube3a mutation at Nagasaki University5 and were shipped to Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine or Hamamatsu University School of Medicine for use in all experimental procedures. Ube3am−/p+ mice were obtained by crossing a heterogeneous female mouse lacking paternal Ube3a with a WT male mouse. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction of mouse tail DNA, as described previously5. After weaning, 3–5 mice were housed in ventilated cages with water and feed provided ad libitum. Mice were housed under a 12-h light/ 12-h dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.), with temperature and humidity maintained at 23–25 °C and 45–55%, respectively. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Hamamatsu University School of Medicine and Hokkaido University, and followed the National Institutes of Health guidelines and ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Immunoblotting
The hippocampal regions were dissected from the collected brains and homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 1% Triton X-100) containing protease inhibitors (Roche, #1697498). The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000×g at 4 °C, and the supernatants were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and heated at 100 °C for 5 min. The protein concentrations of the samples were determined using the Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of proteins were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (7.5% acrylamide gel) and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were then blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin and incubated overnight with antibodies against the target proteins at 4 °C. The blots were then incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (GE Healthcare) for 1 h at room temperature (23–25 °C). Bands were visualized with ECL prime or ECL select western blot detection reagent (Cytiva) and imaged using a ChemiDoc MP imaging system (Bio-Rad). Quantification was performed using Image Lab software (version 6.0, Bio-Rad). The KCC2 and NKCC1 band intensities were normalized to β-actin band intensity. Data were obtained from a separate set of mice and stored for statistical analysis. The following primary antibodies were used for the target proteins. KCC2: Millipore, #07-432 (1:1000); NKCC1: Millipore, #MABS1237 (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA) (1:1000) for the first cohort or Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, University of Iowa, T4 (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA) (1:2000) for the second cohort; and β-actin (1:5000; Sigma-Aldrich, #A5441) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MS, USA). Both antibodies against NKCC1 were T4 monoclonal antibodies and were not NKCC isoform-specific. However, NKCC2 transcript and proteins are not present in the brain56 and their specificity for NKCC1 in the adult hippocampus has been validated by the detection of no signals on western blotting obtained from NKCC1 null mutant mice57.
Electrophysiology
Experiments were performed on acute hippocampal slices prepared from P25–28 Ube3am−/p+ or WT littermate mice. Both male and female mice were included in the electrophysiological experiments. We recorded each genotype on consecutive days, whenever possible. Mice were killed by decapitation under deep anesthesia using halothane or isoflurane, and brain coronal slices containing the hippocampus (350 μm thick) were cut on a microslicer (VT-1000S, Leica Microsystems; or VF-300-0Z, Precisionary) in ice-cold modified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 220 sucrose, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 12.0 Mg2SO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 26.0 NaHCO3, and 30.0 glucose, pH 7.4 when gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2. The slices were kept in standard ACSF solution consisting of (in mM) 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.0 MgSO4, 2.0 CaCl2, 26.0 NaHCO3, and 20.0 glucose, pH 7.4 when gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2, at room temperature for over 1 h before experiments58.
Slices were then transferred to a recording chamber on the stage of a microscope (BX61, Olympus, or Axioskop2, Zeiss) and continuously perfused with oxygenated ACSF at a flow rate of 2 ml/min at 30 °C. CA1 pyramidal neurons were visually identified on a monitor using a 40 × water immersion objective lens with an infrared differential interference contrast filter. The patch electrodes were pulled from borosilicate capillary tubing with a 1.5 mm diameter (GD-1.5; Narishige) with a horizontal puller P-97 (Sutter Instruments). The electrode resistance ranged from 4 to 6 MΩ for conventional whole-cell patch-clamp recordings and from 3 to 5 MΩ for gramicidin-perforated patch-clamp recordings. Signals were recorded using a MultiClamp 700 B amplifier or Axopatch 200 B (Molecular Devices), low-pass filtered at 2 kHz, and digitized at 6–10 kHz using a Digidata 1332A data acquisition system (Molecular Devices).
Gramicidin perforated patch-clamp recordings were performed as previously described17. The pipette solution contained (150 mM): 150 KCl and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.3, KOH). Gramicidin was dissolved in DMSO (10 mg/ml) and then diluted in the pipette-filling solution to a final concentration of 5–10 μg/ml immediately prior to the experiments. The cells were voltage clamped and stepped into various test potentials. GABA (50 μM) was applied for 10 ms through a patch pipette to the soma of the recorded neuron at each membrane potential. To obtain I–V curves from gramicidin recordings, the membrane potential values were corrected for the voltage drop across the series resistance: Vcorr = Vcom − Iclamp × Rs, where Vcom is the command potential, Iclamp is the clamp current, and Rs is the series resistance17. To determine the reversal potential for the GABA-induced current (EGABA), these values were plotted as a function of the series resistance-corrected membrane potential. [Cl−]i was calculated from the determined EGABA according to the Nernst equation.
To evaluate the GABAA receptor-mediated currents, whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed under the presence of 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2, 3-dione (CNQX; 20 µM), D-(-)-2-Amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (D-AP5; 50 µM), and CGP55845 (3 µM). Recorded neurons were voltage-clamped at a holding potential of − 60 mV using a pipette solution consisting of (in mM) 130 CsCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 MgCl2,10 HEPES–NaOH, 0.5 EGTA-KOH, 1.5 Mg-ATP, 0.5 mM Na2-GTP, and 2.5 QX314 (pH 7.3). Tonic GABA currents were evaluated as the difference in the mean baseline current devoid of synaptic events (total 3 s) during and before the application of SR95531 (10 µM)7. To evaluate excitatory postsynaptic currents, whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were performed in the presence of SR95531 (10 µM) and CGP55845 (3 µM). The voltage was clamped at − 60 mV with the pipette solution consisting of (in mM): 150 K-CH3SO3, 5 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 10 HEPES–NaOH, 0.5 EGTA-KOH, 3 Mg-ATP, 0.4 Na2-GTP (pH 7.3). Resting membrane potentials were recorded using the same pipette solution. The reported values were corrected for liquid junction potentials of + 10.5 mV.
For recordings of miniature inhibitory currents (mIPSCs) or excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs), tetrodotoxin (1 µM) was additionally applied to the perfusion solution. Individual mIPSCs and mEPSCs were visually identified from 5-min current traces to analyze their frequency, peak amplitude, 10–90% rise time, and decay time using Mini Analysis (Synaptosoft, NJ). The data obtained from each event were averaged. For the analysis of paired-pulse ratios, two consecutive inhibitory or excitatory postsynaptic currents were evoked by electrical stimulation (interval, 50 ms; duration, 200 µs; intensity, 100–400 pA) using a monopolar glass pipette filled with ACSF. The ratios of the peak current amplitudes between the second and first evoked postsynaptic currents were determined.
Long-term administration of bumetanide
We used micro-osmotic pumps (Model, 2004, Alzet, USA) to allow continuous administration of bumetanide40. Pumps were filled with 25.6 mg bumetanide in 200 μl 70% PEG/30% DMSO to deliver approximately 0.8 mg kg−1 h−1 for up to 28 days and subcutaneously implanted under anesthesia. This infusion rate allows for the achievement of sufficient plasma concentration for inhibiting NKCC1 in the rodent brain without any adverse effect27. All subsequent experiments were performed between 21 and 28 days after implantation. The diuretic effects of this protocol were also evaluated from 24-h urine volume in WT mice by holding a mouse in a metabolic cage for 24 h.
Behavioral analysis
All behavioral analyses were conducted during the light cycle using 6-to 8-month-old male mice. Prior to each test, mice were habituated to the testing room for at least 60 min. For the novel object recognition and open field tests, a video tracking system (ANY-maze; Stoelting Co., USA) was used to capture the procedures.
The task procedure of the novel object recognition test consists of three phases: habituation, familiarization, and test59. Each mouse was allowed to explore the empty arena (40 × 40 × 40 cm) freely for 5 min, which was followed by exploration of two identical sample objects for 5 min. After a retention interval of 30 min, the mice were returned to the arena for 5 min during the test phase. In this phase, one of the two samples is replaced with a novel object. The number of times a mouse showed exploratory behavior (direct contact or sniffing toward an object within less than 2 cm of the object) was manually counted offline by an examiner who was blinded to the subjects. The discrimination index (DI) was calculated using the following equation:
where NN and NF represent the number of exploration times for the novel and familiar objects, respectively.
Motor function was analyzed using an accelerating rotarod (4–40 rpm for 5 min; model MK-670, Muromachi, Japan). The mice were trained to stay on the rod at a constant speed (5 rpm for 5 min) prior to data acquisition. Four trials per day were conducted for two consecutive days at 30 min interval. The time spent on the rotarod or the time until the mouse made three consecutive rotations on the rotarod was used in the subsequent statistical analysis.
For the open field test, each mouse was placed in the center of an empty arena (40 × 40 × 40 cm) and allowed to explore freely for 30 min. We analyzed the total distance traveled as well as the relative distance traveled in the center region (25 cm × 25 cm in the middle of the arena) in relation to the total distance traveled.
Flurothyl inhalation-induced seizures
Seizure susceptibility of 6- to 8-month-old male mice was evaluated by an acute seizure induction paradigm using flurothyl inhalation, as reported previously8. Mice were placed in an airtight acrylic cylinder chamber (diameter, 14 cm; height, 20 cm; Asone 1-073-01) 1 min before starting flurothyl administration. A 10% fluorothyl (bis [2,2,2-trifluoroethyl] ether; Sigma-Aldrich) solution was dispensed with 95% ethanol and infused into a gauze pad (3 × 3 cm) at a flow rate of 200 µL/min using a syringe pump suspended 5 cm below the ceiling. We recorded the latency from the beginning of administration to the first presentation of (1) a myoclonic seizure: a sudden, brief muscle contraction of the neck and body, and (2) tonic seizures: sustained loss of posture control (> 2 s) accompanied by trunk rigidity60. The experiment was performed in a ventilated safety cabinet to avoid exposing the examiner to a gas containing fluorothyl.
Electroencephalography (EEG) recording and analysis
Cortical EEGs were recorded using stainless steel screw electrodes (Plastic One, USA) in 6–9-month-old male mice. Cortical recording electrodes (A/P: − 3.0 mm, ML: ± 3.0 mm, relative to bregma), a reference electrode over the cerebellum, and a grand electrode anterior to bregma were implanted subdurally under anesthesia with isoflurane. All electrodes were inserted into a 6-channel pedestal and connected to a commutator for recording. Mice were allowed at least 7 days of recovery from surgery before recording.
Simultaneous video-EEG recording was performed for 24 h. EEG signals were amplified by a differential AC amplifier (Model 1700, A-M Systems, USA), bandpass-filtered between 0.1 Hz and 500 kHz, and digitized at 2000 Hz (MP170 and AcqKnowlegde software; Biopack Systems, USA) for storage on a PC. EEG spikes were automatically detected by threshold-based event detection using the Clampfit 10 software (Molecular Devices, USA). The threshold amplitude was set to four times the standard deviation of the baseline EEG activity during non-REM sleep. Waveforms over 200 ms in duration were rejected as artifacts. Events including three consecutive spike trains within a 200-ms interval were counted as epileptic discharges.
Spectral analysis was performed using Darbeliai, a plug-in of EEGLAB61 running MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc., USA). After visually inspecting the EEG traces and excluding artifacts, 10 EEG epochs (duration 9 s) during the awake state were collected for power spectrum analysis. We calculated the relative EEG powers of the δ (1–4 Hz), θ (4–9 Hz), α (9–13 Hz), and β (13–30 Hz) frequency bands for each epoch. The EEG power of each mouse was determined by averaging over 10 epochs.
Statistical analysis
Differences in immunoblotting, patch-clamp recording, and EEG data between genotypes were determined using an unpaired t test. Welch’s correction was applied when the F-test result for the comparison of variance was significant. Alterations in EEG data before and after bumetanide application in Ube3am−/p+ mice were determined using a paired t test. The effects of bumetanide on behavioral analyses and seizure susceptibility were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for all except the rotarod test) or three-way repeated-measures ANOVA (for the rotarod test) followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism 9 (GraphPad Software), and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Dr. Tatsuya Kishino from Nagasaki University, Center for Frontier Life Sciences, for providing the Ube3am−/p+ mice and Dr. Atsushi Manabe from the Department of Pediatrics, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, for providing scientific advice and supervision during the preparation of the manuscript. This research was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number: 18H02777 to K.E. and 21H02661 to A.F.), Angelman Syndrome Foundation (K.E.), Takeda Science Foundation (K.E. and D.S.), Uehara Memorial Foundation (D.S.), and Salt Science Research Foundation (A.F.). None of the funding sources were involved in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Author contributions
K.E. and M.W. conceived the project, designed the study, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. S.N., H.S., D.S., and Y.T. interpreted the data and edited the manuscript. A.F. provided an experimental guide, supervised the study and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7186642.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Kiyoshi Egawa and Miho Watanabe.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-023-32376-z.
References
- 1.Kishino T, Lalande M, Wagstaff J. UBE3A/E6-AP mutations cause Angelman syndrome. Nat. Genet. 1997;15:70–73. doi: 10.1038/ng0197-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Saitoh S, et al. Molecular and clinical study of 61 Angelman syndrome patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1994;52:158–163. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320520207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Williams CA, et al. Angelman syndrome: consensus for diagnostic criteria. Angelman syndrome foundation. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1995;56:237–238. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320560224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jiang YH, et al. Mutation of the Angelman ubiquitin ligase in mice causes increased cytoplasmic p53 and deficits of contextual learning and long-term potentiation. Neuron. 1998;21:799–811. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80596-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miura K, et al. Neurobehavioral and electroencephalographic abnormalities in Ube3a maternal-deficient mice. Neurobiol. Dis. 2002;9:149–159. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stoppel DC, Anderson MP. Hypersociability in the Angelman syndrome mouse model. Exp. Neurol. 2017;293:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Egawa K, et al. Decreased tonic inhibition in cerebellar granule cells causes motor dysfunction in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012;4:163ra157. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Egawa K, et al. Flurothyl-induced seizure paradigm revealed higher seizure susceptibility in middle-aged Angelman syndrome mouse model. Brain Dev. 2021;43:515–520. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2020.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wallace ML, Burette AC, Weinberg RJ, Philpot BD. Maternal loss of Ube3a produces an excitatory/inhibitory imbalance through neuron type-specific synaptic defects. Neuron. 2012;74:793–800. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sell GL, Margolis SS, From UBE. From UBE3A to Angelman syndrome: A substrate perspective. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:322. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Musi CA, Agrò G, Buccarello L, Camuso S, Borsello T. JNK signaling activation in the Ube3a maternal deficient mouse model: Its specific inhibition prevents post-synaptic protein-enriched fraction alterations and cognitive deficits in Angelman syndrome model. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020;140:104812. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tyzio R, et al. Oxytocin-mediated GABA inhibition during delivery attenuates autism pathogenesis in rodent offspring. Science. 2014;343:675–679. doi: 10.1126/science.1247190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Deidda G, et al. Reversing excitatory GABAAR signaling restores synaptic plasticity and memory in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Nat. Med. 2015;21:318–326. doi: 10.1038/nm.3827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ben-Ari Y. NKCC1 chloride importer antagonists attenuate many neurological and psychiatric disorders. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40:536–554. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Dargaei Z, et al. Restoring GABAergic inhibition rescues memory deficits in a Huntington’s disease mouse model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E1618–E1626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716871115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Löscher W, Kaila K. CNS pharmacology of NKCC1 inhibitors. Neuropharmacology. 2022;205:1910. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yamada J, et al. Cl− uptake promoting depolarizing GABA actions in immature rat neocortical neurones is mediated by NKCC1. J. Physiol. 2004;557:829–841. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Payne JA, Rivera C, Voipio J, Kaila K. Cation-chloride co-transporters in neuronal communication, development and trauma. Trends Neurosci. 2003;26:199–206. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00068-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ben-Ari Y. Excitatory actions of GABA during development: the nature of the nurture. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002;3:728–739. doi: 10.1038/nrn920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dzhala VI, et al. NKCC1 transporter facilitates seizures in the developing brain. Nat. Med. 2005;11:1205–1213. doi: 10.1038/nm1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kahle KT, et al. Modulation of neuronal activity by phosphorylation of the K-Cl cotransporter KCC2. Trends Neurosci. 2013;36:726–737. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2013.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Watanabe M, Fukuda A. Development and regulation of chloride homeostasis in the central nervous system. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2015;9:371. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Banerjee A, et al. Jointly reduced inhibition and excitation underlies circuit-wide changes in cortical processing in Rett syndrome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016;113:E7287–E7296. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615330113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Talos DM, et al. Altered inhibition in tuberous sclerosis and type IIb cortical dysplasia. Ann. Neurol. 2012;71:539–551. doi: 10.1002/ana.22696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hsu Y-T, et al. Enhanced Na+-K+-2Cl− cotransporter 1 underlies motor dysfunction in Huntington's disease. Mov. Disord. 2019;34:845–857. doi: 10.1002/MDS.27651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Parrini M, et al. Restoring neuronal chloride homeostasis with anti-NKCC1 gene therapy rescues cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Down syndrome. Mol. Ther. 2021;29:3072–3092. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.05.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Brandt C, Nozadze M, Heuchert N, Rattka M, Löscher W. Disease-modifying effects of phenobarbital and the NKCC1 inhibitor bumetanide in the pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:8602–8612. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0633-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lemonnier E, et al. A randomised controlled trial of bumetanide in the treatment of autism in children. Transl. Psychiatry. 2012;2:e202. doi: 10.1038/tp.2012.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lemonnier E, et al. Effects of bumetanide on neurobehavioral function in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Transl. Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1056. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sprengers JJ, et al. Bumetanide for core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (BAMBI): A single center, double-blinded, participant-randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase-2 superiority trial. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2021;60:865–876. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Savardi A, Borgogno M, De Vivo M, Cancedda L. Pharmacological tools to target NKCC1 in brain disorders. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2021;42:1009–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2021.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Isomura Y, et al. Synaptically activated Cl− accumulation responsible for depolarizing GABAergic responses in mature hippocampal neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 2003;90:2752–2756. doi: 10.1152/jn.00142.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Doyon N, Vinay L, Prescott SA, De Koninck Y. Chloride regulation: A dynamic equilibrium crucial for synaptic inhibition. Neuron. 2016;89:1157–1172. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yelhekar TD, Druzin M, Johansson S. Contribution of resting conductance, GABA(A)-receptor mediated miniature synaptic currents and neurosteroid to chloride homeostasis in central neurons. eNeuro. 2017;4:0019-0017.2017. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0019-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yashiro K, et al. Ube3a is required for experience-dependent maturation of the neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2009;12:777–783. doi: 10.1038/nn.2327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Greer PL, et al. The Angelman syndrome protein Ube3A regulates synapse development by ubiquitinating arc. Cell. 2010;140:704–716. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mody I, Pearce RA. Diversity of inhibitory neurotransmission through GABAA receptors. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27:569–575. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bruinsma CF, et al. Dissociation of locomotor and cerebellar deficits in a murine Angelman syndrome model. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:4305–4315. doi: 10.1172/JCI83541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lee S, et al. Channel-mediated tonic GABA release from glia. Science. 2010;330:790–796. doi: 10.1126/science.1184334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.MacKenzie G, O’Toole KK, Moss SJ, Maguire J. Compromised GABAergic inhibition contributes to tumor-associated epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2016;126:185–196. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Born HA, et al. Strain-dependence of the Angelman syndrome phenotypes in Ube3a maternal deficiency mice. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:8451. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08825-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Thibert RL, et al. Epilepsy in Angelman syndrome: A questionnaire-based assessment of the natural history and current treatment options. Epilepsia. 2009;50:2369–2376. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02108.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Larson AM, Shinnick JE, Shaaya EA, Thiele EA, Thibert RL. Angelman syndrome in adulthood. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2015;167A(331–344):331–344. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Judson MC, et al. GABAergic neuron-specific loss of Ube3a causes Angelman syndrome-like EEG abnormalities and enhances seizure susceptibility. Neuron. 2016;90:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.02.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Khatri N, Man HY. The autism and Angelman syndrome protein Ube3A/E6AP: The gene, E3 ligase ubiquitination targets and neurobiological functions. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019;12:109. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Aguado F, et al. BDNF regulates spontaneous correlated activity at early developmental stages by increasing synaptogenesis and expression of the K+/Cl− co-transporter KCC2. Development. 2003;130:1267–1280. doi: 10.1242/dev.00351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cao C, et al. Impairment of TrkB-PSD-95 signaling in Angelman syndrome. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001478–e1001478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sulis Sato S, et al. Simultaneous two-photon imaging of intracellular chloride concentration and pH in mouse pyramidal neurons in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2017;114:8770–8779. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702861114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Markadieu N, Delpire E. Physiology and pathophysiology of SLC12A1/2 transporters. Pflugers Arch. 2014;466:91–105. doi: 10.1007/s00424-013-1370-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Virtanen MA, Uvarov P, Hübner CA, Kaila K. NKCC1, an elusive molecular target in brain development: Making sense of the existing data. Cells. 2020;9:2607. doi: 10.3390/cells9122607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang S, et al. In vivo effects of bumetanide at brain concentrations incompatible with NKCC1 inhibition on newborn DGC structure and spontaneous EEG seizures following hypoxia-induced neonatal seizures. Neuroscience. 2015;286:203–215. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kanaka C, et al. The differential expression patterns of messenger RNAs encoding K-Cl cotransporters (KCC1,2) and Na-K-2Cl cotransporter (NKCC1) in the rat nervous system. Neuroscience. 2001;104:933–946. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00149-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sun AX, et al. Potassium channel dysfunction in human neuronal models of Angelman syndrome. Science. 2019;366:1486–1492. doi: 10.1126/science.aav5386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sun J, et al. PKA and Ube3a regulate SK2 channel trafficking to promote synaptic plasticity in hippocampus: Implications for Angelman Syndrome. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:9824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66790-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kaphzan H, Buffington SA, Jung JI, Rasband MN, Klann E. Alterations in intrinsic membrane properties and the axon initial segment in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:17637–17648. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4162-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gamba G, et al. Molecular cloning, primary structure, and characterization of two members of the mammalian electroneutral sodium-(potassium)-chloride cotransporter family expressed in kidney. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:17713–17722. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32499-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chen H, Luo J, Kintner DB, Shull GE, Sun D. Na(+)-dependent chloride transporter (NKCC1)-null mice exhibit less gray and white matter damage after focal cerebral ischemia. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2005;25:54–66. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Egawa K, Yamada J, Furukawa T, Yanagawa Y, Fukuda A. Cl− homeodynamics in gap junction-coupled astrocytic networks on activation of GABAergic synapses. J. Physiol. 2013;591:3901–3917. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.257162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Antunes M, Biala G. The novel object recognition memory: Neurobiology, test procedure, and its modifications. Cogn. Process. 2012;13:93–110. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0430-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Hashimoto Y, Araki H, Suemaru K, Gomita Y. Effects of drugs acting on the GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex on flurothyl-induced seizures in Mongolian gerbils. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006;536:241–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2004;134:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7186642.