|
|
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information. |
|
Status |
Public on Jan 07, 2017 |
Title |
FS5 |
Sample type |
SRA |
|
|
Source name |
Sperm
|
Organism |
Geospiza fortis |
Characteristics |
tissue: Sperm developmental stage: Adult
|
Treatment protocol |
Samples from different cell types, species, and collection locations were compared.
|
Growth protocol |
Red blood cell and sperm samples were collected from wild finches
|
Extracted molecule |
genomic DNA |
Extraction protocol |
Genomic DNA from finch red blood cells (erythrocytes) was prepared using the Qiagen DNAeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA). The manufacturer’s instructions for nucleated blood samples were followed, but in the final DNA elution step H2O was used instead of the buffer provided in the kit. Genomic DNA from finch sperm was prepared as follows: collected sperm suspension was adjusted to 100 μl with 1 x Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) then 820 μl DNA extraction buffer (50mM Tris pH8, 10mM EDTA pH8, 0.5% SDS) and 80 μl 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT) were added and the sample was incubated at 65°C for 15 minutes. Next, 80 μl Proteinase K (20 mg/ml) were added and the sample was incubated on a rotator at 55°C for 2 hours. After incubation, 300 μl of protein precipitation solution (Promega, A795A) were added, then the sample was mixed and incubated on ice for 15 minutes, then spun at 4°C at 13,000 rpm for 20 minutes. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube, then precipitated over night with the same volume of 100% isopropanol and 2 μl glycoblue at -20°C. The sample was then centrifuged and the pellet washed with 75% ethanol, then air-dried and re-suspended in 100 μl H2O. DNA concentration was measured using a Nanodrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). The MeDIP pools were used to create libraries for next generation sequencing (NGS) at the University of Nevada, Reno Genomics Core Laboratory using the NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina®, starting at step 1.4 of the manufacturer’s protocol to generate double stranded DNA. After this step the manufacturer’s protocol was followed.
|
|
|
Library strategy |
MeDIP-Seq |
Library source |
genomic |
Library selection |
5-methylcytidine antibody |
Instrument model |
Illumina HiSeq 2500 |
|
|
Description |
allForSperm.results.csv.gz
|
Data processing |
Basic read quality was verified using summaries produced by FastQC The reads for each sample for both CNV and DMR analyses were mapped to the zebra finch (Taenopygia guttata) genome using Bowtie2 The mapped read files were then converted to sorted BAM files using SAMtools The MEDIPS R package was used to calculate differential coverage between sample groups. To identify DMR, the reference genome was broken into 100 bp windows. The edgeR Pvalue was used to determine the relative difference between the two sample groups for each genomic window. Windows with an edgeR P value less than 1e-3 were considered DMR. The DMR edges were extended until no genomic window with an edgeR P value less than 0.1 remained within 1000 bp of the DMR. The DMR that included at least two windows with an edgeR P value < 1e-3 were then selected for further analysis and annotated. Genome_build: taeGut3.2.4 Supplementary_files_format_and_content: The results of the edgeR analysis in CSV format. This includes raw read counts for each genomic window as well as the calculated p-value and other summary values.
|
|
|
Submission date |
Oct 11, 2016 |
Last update date |
May 15, 2019 |
Contact name |
Michael K Skinner |
E-mail(s) |
[email protected]
|
Organization name |
WSU
|
Department |
SBS
|
Street address |
Abelson 507
|
City |
Pullman |
State/province |
WA |
ZIP/Postal code |
99163 |
Country |
USA |
|
|
Platform ID |
GPL22544 |
Series (1) |
GSE87825 |
Epigenetic variation between urban and rural populations of Darwin’s finches |
|
Relations |
BioSample |
SAMN05895099 |
SRA |
SRX2238761 |
Supplementary data files not provided |
SRA Run Selector |
Raw data are available in SRA |
Processed data are available on Series record |
|
|
|
|
|