NCBI Logo
GEO Logo
   NCBI > GEO > Accession DisplayHelp Not logged in | LoginHelp
GEO help: Mouse over screen elements for information.
          Go
Sample GSM2929059 Query DataSets for GSM2929059
Status Public on Dec 15, 2018
Title WD_S2
Sample type SRA
 
Source name Water Deficit_Shoot
Organism Vitis riparia
Characteristics water condition: Water Deficit
tissue: Shoot
Treatment protocol Three shoots were allowed to develop on each grapevine; after 30 days growth, when the grapevine shoots had reached 12-15 nodes, 36 grapevines were randomized into two groups: water deficit (WD) and well-watered control (C). Five days after randomization, differential water treatments began in replicates (3 vines/ replicate) of each treatment: WD received no water and C received 2 L of tap water each day. Root and shoot samples from the 14 d C and WD treatments were used for transcriptomic analysis, as this time point showed distinct physiological differences between treatments.
Growth protocol Spur-pruned, V. riparia Michx. vines were removed from cold storage, root pruned, repotted in 15 L pots, and grown under a long photoperiod (15 h) with 25/20°C ± 3°C day/night temperatures and 600 to 1400 μmol m-2 sec-1 photosynthetic photon flux in a climate-controlled, un-shaded glass greenhouse (En Tech Control Systems Inc., Montrose, MN) in Brookings, SD, USA (44.3°N).
Extracted molecule total RNA
Extraction protocol Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of each replicate (n=3) frozen pulverized shoot tips as described by Mathiason K. et al. (2009). Total RNA was extracted from root tips (5 cm) of each replicate (n=3) using the Qiagen Rneasy Midi RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, 75144) according to manufacturer protocol.
Total RNA samples were sent to Cornell University Life Sciences Core Laboratories and single-end sequences were generated using an Illumina HiSeq 2000.
 
Library strategy RNA-Seq
Library source transcriptomic
Library selection cDNA
Instrument model Illumina HiSeq 2000
 
Description Water deficit whole shoot tissue
Data processing FASTQ files were explored using FASTX toolkit and cleaned using Prinseq
The cleaning procedure included, trimming low quality reads from both ends until a bp of Phred quality score >= 20 and filtering out reads having below 20 nt.
Bowtie2 V2.1.0 was used to build the index of reference genome, the 12x sequence of V. vinifera PN40024.
TopHat V2.0.8 was used to map each of the cleaned samples to the bowtie build index and Cufflinks V2.2.2 was used to quantify transcript abundance in terms of RPKM.
Differential gene expression, in WD relative to C treatments, was tested by the Cuffdiff program within Cufflinks using its default parameters. V. vinifera V1 gene annotation was used.
Genome_build: 12x V. vinifera PN40024 (http://genomes.cribi.unipd.it/DATA/)
Supplementary_files_format_and_content: text files containing count, RPKM, or cuffdiff output (as indicated in the file name) with the identifiers at:
http://plants.ensembl.org/Vitis_vinifera/Info/Index
http://www.plantgdb.org/VvGDB/
 
Submission date Jan 11, 2018
Last update date Dec 15, 2018
Contact name Anne Fennell
E-mail(s) [email protected]
Phone 605-688-6373
Organization name South Dakota State University
Department Plant Science
Street address 1390 College Ave
City Brookings
State/province SD
ZIP/Postal code 57007
Country USA
 
Platform ID GPL24498
Series (1)
GSE109065 Shoot transcriptomic response is more sensitive to a 14 day water deficit than root transcriptomic response in Vitis riparia
Relations
BioSample SAMN08348587
SRA SRX3584213

Supplementary data files not provided
SRA Run SelectorHelp
Raw data are available in SRA
Processed data are available on Series record

| NLM | NIH | GEO Help | Disclaimer | Accessibility |
NCBI Home NCBI Search NCBI SiteMap