Hereditary Prostate Cancer Panel - Clinical Genetic Test - GTR

Genetic Testing Registry

View Advanced Search Options

Classic view of this page

Hereditary Prostate Cancer Panel

Clinical Genetic Test

offered by

Mayo Clinic Laboratories

View lab's test page

GTR Test Accession: GTR000597362.2

CAP

INHERITED DISEASEREPRODUCTIVE HEALTHCANCER ... View more

Last updated in GTR: 2024-04-15

Last annual review date for the lab: 2024-05-28

At a Glance

Test purpose:

Diagnosis; Predictive; Therapeutic management

Conditions (1):

Familial prostate cancer

Genes (18):

ATM (11q22.3); BRCA1 (17q21.31); BRCA2 (13q13.1); BRIP1 (17q23.2); CHEK2 (22q12.1) more...

Methods (1):

Molecular Genetics - Sequence analysis of the entire coding region: Next-Generation (NGS)/Massively parallel sequencing (MPS)

Target population:

Evaluation of patients with a personal or family history suggestive …

Clinical validity:

Not provided

Clinical utility:

Establish or confirm diagnosis; Guidance for management; Guidance for selecting a drug therapy and/or dose; ...

Ordering Information

Offered by:

Mayo Clinic Laboratories
View lab's website
View lab's test page

Test short name:

PRS8P

Specimen Source:

Peripheral (whole) blood
View specimen requirements

Who can order:

Genetic Counselor
Health Care Provider
Licensed Dentist
Licensed Physician
Nurse Practitioner
Physician Assistant
Public Health Mandate
Registered Nurse

Test Order Code:

PRS8P
View other test codes

LOINC codes:

**LOINC codes notice

CPT codes:

**AMA CPT codes notice

Lab contact:

Megan Hoenig, MS, MPH, Certified Genetic counselor, CGC, Genetic Counselor
[email protected]
1-800-533-1710

Contact Policy:

Laboratory can only accept contact from health care providers. Patients/families are encouraged to discuss genetic testing options with their health care provider.

How to Order:

https://www.mayocliniclabs.com/test-catalog/Specimen/614576
Order URL

Test service:

Clinical Testing/Confirmation of Mutations Identified Previously
OrderCode: FMTT

Test development:

Test developed by laboratory (no manufacturer test name)

Informed consent required:

Based on applicable state law

Pre-test genetic counseling required:

Decline to answer

Post-test genetic counseling required:

Decline to answer

Recommended fields not provided:

Test strategy

Conditions

Total conditions: 1

Condition/Phenotype	Identifier

Test Targets

Genes

Total genes: 18

Gene	Associated Condition	Germline or Somatic	Allele (Lab-provided)	Variant in NCBI

Methodology

Total methods: 1

Method Category

Test method

Instrument

Sequence analysis of the entire coding region

Next-Generation (NGS)/Massively parallel sequencing (MPS)

Illumina NovaSeq 6000

Clinical Information

Test purpose:

Diagnosis; Predictive; Therapeutic management

Clinical utility:

Establish or confirm diagnosis

View citations (1)

Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Horwitz EM, Ippolito JE, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKay R, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Pow-Sang JM, Reiter R, Richey S, Roach Iii M, Rosenfeld S, Shabsigh A, Spratt DE, Teply BA, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. Epub 2021 Feb 02. PMID: 33545689.

Guidance for management

View citations (1)

Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Horwitz EM, Ippolito JE, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKay R, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Pow-Sang JM, Reiter R, Richey S, Roach Iii M, Rosenfeld S, Shabsigh A, Spratt DE, Teply BA, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. Epub 2021 Feb 02. PMID: 33545689.

Guidance for selecting a drug therapy and/or dose

View citations (1)

Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Horwitz EM, Ippolito JE, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKay R, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Pow-Sang JM, Reiter R, Richey S, Roach Iii M, Rosenfeld S, Shabsigh A, Spratt DE, Teply BA, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. Epub 2021 Feb 02. PMID: 33545689.

Predictive risk information for patient and/or family members

View citations (1)

Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Horwitz EM, Ippolito JE, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKay R, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Pow-Sang JM, Reiter R, Richey S, Roach Iii M, Rosenfeld S, Shabsigh A, Spratt DE, Teply BA, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. Epub 2021 Feb 02. PMID: 33545689.

Target population:

Evaluation of patients with a personal or family history suggestive of a hereditary prostate cancer syndrome. Establishing a diagnosis of a hereditary prostate cancer syndrome allowing for targeted cancer surveillance based on associated risks. Identifying genetic variants associated with increased risk for prostate cancer, allowing for predictive testing and appropriate … View more

View citations (6)

Lange EM, Salinas CA, Zuhlke KA, Ray AM, Wang Y, Lu Y, Ho LA, Luo J, Cooney KA. Early onset prostate cancer has a significant genetic component. Prostate. 2012;72(2):147-56. doi:10.1002/pros.21414. Epub 2011 May 02. PMID: 21538423.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL, . Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405-24. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 05. PMID: 25741868.
Pritchard CC, Mateo J, Walsh MF, De Sarkar N, Abida W, Beltran H, Garofalo A, Gulati R, Carreira S, Eeles R, Elemento O, Rubin MA, Robinson D, Lonigro R, Hussain M, Chinnaiyan A, Vinson J, Filipenko J, Garraway L, Taplin ME, AlDubayan S, Han GC, Beightol M, Morrissey C, Nghiem B, Cheng HH, Montgomery B, Walsh T, Casadei S, Berger M, Zhang L, Zehir A, Vijai J, Scher HI, Sawyers C, Schultz N, Kantoff PW, Solit D, Robson M, Van Allen EM, Offit K, de Bono J, Nelson PS. Inherited DNA-Repair Gene Mutations in Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(5):443-53. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603144. Epub 2016 Jul 06. PMID: 27433846.
Daly MB, Pal T, Berry MP, Buys SS, Dickson P, Domchek SM, Elkhanany A, Friedman S, Goggins M, Hutton ML, , Karlan BY, Khan S, Klein C, Kohlmann W, , Kurian AW, Laronga C, Litton JK, Mak JS, , Menendez CS, Merajver SD, Norquist BS, Offit K, Pederson HJ, Reiser G, , Senter-Jamieson L, , Shannon KM, Shatsky R, Visvanathan K, Weitzel JN, Wick MJ, Wisinski KB, Yurgelun MB, Darlow SD, Dwyer MA. Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(1):77-102. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0001. Epub 2021 Jan 06. PMID: 33406487.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7-33. doi:10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12. PMID: 33433946.
Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Desai N, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Farrington TA, Gao X, Horwitz EM, Ippolito JE, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKay R, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Pow-Sang JM, Reiter R, Richey S, Roach Iii M, Rosenfeld S, Shabsigh A, Spratt DE, Teply BA, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(2):134-143. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008. Epub 2021 Feb 02. PMID: 33545689.

Variant Interpretation:

What is the protocol for interpreting a variation as a VUS?
All detected variants are evaluated according to the most recent American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) recommendations. Variants are classified based on known, predicted, or possible pathogenicity and reported with interpretive comments detailing their potential or known significance.

Are family members with defined clinical status recruited to assess significance of VUS without charge?
Yes. Contact lab for details

Will the lab re-contact the ordering physician if variant interpretation changes?
No. The laboratory encourages health care providers to contact the laboratory at any time to learn how the status of a particular variant may have changed over time.

Research:

Is research allowed on the sample after clinical testing is complete?
Research testing is only performed under IRB approved protocol with an opt-out policy in place.

Recommended fields not provided:

Clinical validity, Sample negative report, Sample positive report

Technical Information

Test Procedure:

Next generation sequencing (NGS) and/or Sanger sequencing is performed to test for the presence of variants in coding regions and intron/exon boundaries of the genes analyzed, as well as some other regions that have known pathogenic variants. The human genome reference GRCh37/hg19 build was used for sequence read alignment. At … View more

Availability:

Tests performed
Entire test performed in-house

Analytical Validity:

At least 99% of the bases are covered at a read depth >30X. Sensitivity is estimated at >99% for single nucleotide variants, >94% for indels up to 39 base pairs, >95% for deletions up to 75 base pairs and insertions up to 47 base pairs.

Assay limitations:

Clinical Correlations Test results should be interpreted in the context of clinical findings, family history, and other laboratory data. Misinterpretation of results may occur if the information provided is inaccurate or incomplete. If testing was performed because of a clinically significant family history, it is often useful to first test … Clinical Correlations Test results should be interpreted in the context of clinical findings, family history, and other laboratory data. Misinterpretation of results may occur if the information provided is inaccurate or incomplete. If testing was performed because of a clinically significant family history, it is often useful to first test an affected family member. Detection of a reportable variant in an affected family member would allow for more informative testing of at-risk individuals. To discuss the availability of further testing options, or for assistance in the interpretation of these results, Mayo Clinic Laboratory genetic counselors can be contacted at 800-533-1710. Technical Limitations Next-generation sequencing may not detect all types of genomic variants. In rare cases, false negative or false positive results may occur. The depth of coverage may be variable for some target regions; assay performance below the minimum acceptable criteria or for failed regions will be noted. Given these limitations, negative results do not rule out the diagnosis of a genetic disorder. If a specific clinical disorder is suspected, evaluation by alternative methods can be considered. There may be regions of genes that cannot be effectively evaluated by sequencing or deletion and duplication analysis as a result of technical limitations of the assay, including regions of homology, high guanine-cytosine (GC) content, and repetitive sequences. Confirmation of select reportable variants will be performed by alternate methodologies based on internal laboratory criteria. This test is validated to detect 95% of deletions up to 75 base pairs (bp) and insertions up to 47 bp. Insertions/deletions (indels) of 40 or more bp, including mobile element insertions, may be less reliably detected than smaller indels. Deletion/Duplication Analysis: This analysis targets single and multi-exon deletions/duplications; however, in some instances single exon resolution cannot be achieved due to isolated reduction in sequence coverage or inherent genomic complexity. Balanced structural rearrangements (such as translocations and inversions) may not be detected. This test is not designed to detect low levels of mosaicism or to differentiate between somatic and germline variants. If there is a possibility that any detected variant is somatic, additional testing may be necessary to clarify the significance of results. Genes may be added or removed based on updated clinical relevance. Refer to the Targeted Genes and Methodology Details for Hereditary Prostate Cancer Panel in Special Instructions for the most up to date list of genes included in this test. For detailed information regarding gene specific performance and technical limitations, see Method Description or contact a laboratory Genetic Counselor. If the patient has had an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant or a recent heterologous blood transfusion, results may be inaccurate due to the presence of donor DNA. Call Mayo Clinic Laboratories for instructions for testing patients who have received a bone marrow transplant. Reclassification of Variants Policy At this time, it is not standard practice for the laboratory to systematically review previously classified variants on a regular basis. The laboratory encourages health care providers to contact the laboratory at any time to learn how the classification of a particular variant may have changed over time. Variant Evaluation Evaluation and categorization of variants is performed using published American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology recommendations as a guideline. Other gene-specific guidelines may also be considered. Variants are classified based on known, predicted, or possible pathogenicity and reported with interpretive comments detailing their potential or known significance. Variants classified as benign or likely benign are not reported. Multiple in silico evaluation tools may be used to assist in the interpretation of these results. The accuracy of predictions made by in silico evaluation tools is highly dependent upon the data available for a given gene, and periodic updates to these tools may cause predictions to change over time. Results from in silico evaluation tools should be interpreted with caution and professional clinical judgement. View more

Proficiency testing (PT):

Is proficiency testing performed for this test?
Yes

Method used for proficiency testing:
Formal PT program

PT Provider:
American College of Medical Genetics / College of American Pathologists, ACMG/CAP

VUS:

Software used to interpret novel variations
Variants may be analyzed using any combination of the following: Alamut, REVEL, Polyphen-2, SIFT, AGVGD, MutationTaster, SpliceSiteFinder-like, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, SpliceAI, gene-specific online databases, ISCA, UCSC Genome Browser

Laboratory's policy on reporting novel variations
All novel alterations and copy number variants are evaluated for potential pathogenicity and included in the written report, accordingly.

Recommended fields not provided:

Test Confirmation, Citations to support assay limitations, Description of internal test validation method, Citations for Analytical validity, Description of PT method, Major CAP category, CAP category, CAP test list

Regulatory Approval

FDA Review:

Category: FDA exercises enforcement discretion

Additional Information

Reviews:

PubMed Clinical Queries

Reviews in PubMed